sphars 19 hours ago

Been meaning to post this but if you're interested, I set up a RSS feed for the daily Far Side comic[0]. It's a simple scraper that runs daily on GitHub actions and creates an entry for the 2-5 comics and captions of the day. Source code is on GitHub.[1]

I'll have to look into this new section of the website and see about adding that to the feed.

[0]: https://sphars.github.io/rss-feeds/feeds/the_far_side/feed.x...

[1]: https://github.com/sphars/rss-feeds

thom 14 hours ago

The Far Side is like the Simpsons for me, many of the jokes have passed into everyday expressions. If I or my wife are on the loo when the other comes in, we’ll always quote one of my favourites:

https://static0.srcdn.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2023/...

giardini 6 hours ago

This is great!

Periodically, I'll go through one of Larson's cartoon books, laughing all the way. It's like housecleaning for my brain - afterwards everything is spic-and-span and in it's proper place.

The first Gary Larson cartoon I ever saw was "Freeze...OK now...who's the brains in this outfit?". When I saw it I had to see more:

https://i.pinimg.com/736x/c4/c4/75/c4c475c0a2fdc310a34c20722...

  • gcanyon 5 hours ago

    You might appreciate this The Way of the Gun quote:

    Joe Sarno: So, you the brains of this outfit, or is he? Longbaugh: Tell ya the truth, I don't think this is a brains kind of operation.

bhouston 21 hours ago
Waterluvian 16 hours ago

I think it’s about time for me to confess: I really don’t get Gary Larson cartoons. I understand what each is about, but my amusement level doesn’t correlate with their popularity.

It’s a slightly odd, somewhat lonely feeling to see something so universally beloved and popular and feel nothing.

  • vunderba 15 hours ago

    I don't think I've ever laughed at loud at something from Far Side, rather I've always thought of his comics as "smirk-worthy".

    School for the Gifted

    https://imgur.com/a/6wERHNk

    Dog Translator

    https://imgur.com/a/UwDJxXm

    • larrry 13 hours ago

      Have you ever laughed out loud at a cartoon? I don’t think I have, and I would say I enjoy cartoons quite a bit. A grin is about the best reaction I can give to one myself

      • IndySun 7 hours ago

        Have you ever read Viz?

        Specifically on the London underground (or your local public transport) during morning rush hour, with a hangover. It's hard not to laugh out loud.

        https://viz.co.uk/about-viz/

      • technothrasher 11 hours ago

        I'm not sure I've ever laughed out loud at a cartoon, but as a kid, the compilation books of Charles Addams cartoons used to fill me with so much warm pleasure I would read them over and over, and his cartoons still just plain make me happy to this day. I can clearly see that Larson does that same thing for many people.

        • larrry 10 hours ago

          I too am a Charles Addams fan! The best ink painter in cartoons (IMO), and definitely plenty of grin worthy gags.

          Peter Arno is also another good ink painting cartoonist, although his subject matter has generally aged much more poorly…

      • dhosek 9 hours ago

        Yes. Calvin and Hobbes.

        • philsnow an hour ago

          Recently doing a re-read with my eight year olds and still laughing, though at a different layer of meaning/funny than when I was eight.

      • fknorangesite 2 hours ago

        > Have you ever laughed out loud at a cartoon?

        I laughed out loud multiple times clicking on links in this very thread, reading comics I've read dozens (and dozens) of times before.

  • dfxm12 3 hours ago

    Life is less lonely when you focus more on social groups you do have something in common with than trying to latch onto everything that's popular.

    That said, you might not be as alone as you think. The far side has been the butt of many bits: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjfkynJ4hbI

  • linsomniac 7 hours ago

    >time for me to confess

    Don't feel that way. I can totally understand why some people wouldn't "get" (or I'd put it "appreciate") The Far Side. It's a very particular kind of humor, and it's fine that it's "not everyone's cup of tea". I, for example, absolutely loathe poetry. It's like the cilantro of literature of me, and I don't have the gene that makes it not taste like soap. ... Who cares!?!

    I have this "joke" that I dearly love, that I've never met anyone who gets it. It is a bad joke, largely because nobody gets it. It doesn't imply something in me or something lacking in ... everyone else. Humor is just what you find in it. It is: "Well, I defended my thesis in comparative literature, but it seems like he's got a pretty healthy pulse to me..."

    • rkomorn 7 hours ago

      > "Well, I defended my thesis in comparative literature, but it seems like he's got a pretty healthy pulse to me..."

      Definitely sounds like the kind of joke I'd like if I understood it.

      • omegaham 5 hours ago

        A more obvious setup to the joke is

        "Is there a doctor on this plane???"

        "Well yes, but I defended my thesis in comparative literature..."

    • Waterluvian 6 hours ago

      My favourite own joke is when I’m sitting on a beach towel or grass or whatnot and I want to get up, I’ll say,

      “I can’t stand sitting, so I need a hand standing.”

      Nobody ever finds that amusing but it kills me every time.

      • linsomniac 6 hours ago

        One of those situations where I say: "I'm hilarious... to myself."

    • wussboy 7 hours ago

      I'm totally stealing that. Fantastic.

      And, if you want and if the Fates allow, you may have my favourite, completely unappreciated joke:

      "A time traveller!" [wait a few seconds] "Knock knock."

  • aorloff 16 hours ago

    Often if you don't get it, its because you didn't get it.

    There is a famous one of 2 explorers in the jungle and the man is saying "Holy moly Loretta, not only is it still there, but look what it did to the end of my stick !"

    So not really funny unless you can recall (or imagine) a moment when you had a bug on you and you ask someone to brush it off and you have that minute of like, did you get it or is it still there ? If that has actually happened to you, its a hilarious cartoon.

    • cwillu 13 hours ago

      And sometimes not getting it is the joke, for which I need only mention “Cow Tools”

      • firesteelrain 10 hours ago

        Cow Tools was supposed to be “got” but it went over most people’s heads. Gary admitted this

  • ghtbircshotbe 10 hours ago

    A lot of his comics aren't great, having to create 7 per week, a fact he referenced in his comics themselves. But just the way he represented people - pudgy, cat's eye glasses, doing some esoteric thing like collecting butterflies or building a robot in the basement, is amusing to me.

  • mk_stjames 16 hours ago

    What, not a fan of 'Cow tools'? [0]

    [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cow_tools

    • Nition 14 hours ago

      In a way Cow Tools was too simple rather than too hard, so people thought there must be more to it.

      I don't think the joke itself is a bad idea. I remember The Simpsons doing the room full of monkeys on typewriters where one comes up with "it was the best of times, it was the blurst of times" which in a way is a similar joke, right? i.e. Not a good result, but funny because it's still much more than you'd ever expect in reality.

      • firesteelrain 10 hours ago

        Simpsons joke has a reference. It’s not a Simpsons original.

        It is the infinite monkey theorem from the late 19th and early 20th century.

    • WalterBright 16 hours ago

      I didn't get that one, either.

      • busyant 11 hours ago

        I'm curious if you understand this joke (https://i.imgur.com/II5W6Pl.png).

        I think it's similar to the Cow Tools panel.

        Specifically, the Far Side panel plays on the idea of the fact that cows would have a cow-centric view of the world and would likely develop tools that were alien to us. The other part of the 'joke' is that cows don't build tools (afaik). edit: I think the "3rd" part of the joke is that the tools look like shit, which is what you'd expect from even the most talented cows.

        The humor of the space alien joke is similar in that it's pointing out the difficulty that everyone has in understanding how others (other people, other species, etc.) view and describe the world.

      • sitharus 15 hours ago

        Nobody did

        • eszed 7 hours ago

          I was maybe 8, and I thought it was hilarious. <shrug>

  • somat 15 hours ago

    It is probably down to whether you find humor in absurdity as the far side leans rather hard into this.

    The humor "is" very weird, the normal flow is a strange image that is not funny and a simple caption that is also not funny. but coupled together there is something funny about the absurd connection that is made. sort of like a caption meme with better drawing. And honestly I think there are a lot of them that we just don't "get", too strange for comprehension, and we find this funny as well.

    • baobun 10 hours ago

      I can imagine Farside might be hard to "get" for someone meeting it in 2025 - absurdity to the extreme is everywhere now. You can think of it as Skibidi Toilet for a slower, more innocent time.

  • tim333 5 hours ago

    I guess as he puts it here

    >like the proverbial tiger and its stripes, I’m pretty much stuck with my sense of humor. Aren’t we all?

  • bongodongobob 16 hours ago

    I think about it as pushing the boundaries of the minimum amount of funny to be a joke. It's not anti humor, it's not absurdism, it's not ironic. It's trying to approach the absolute least amount of whatever a joke is. Some kind of minimum joke Komolgorov complexity.

    • Ylpertnodi 11 hours ago

      Some people just get the 'cartoon repair man' joke, others don't either.

  • voidfunc 16 hours ago

    I get them sometimes but I feel like its like a lot of stuff, were hostage to the meta and everyone seems to "get" the meta so you have to go along with it or you're an outsider.

    Yay humans.

  • PlunderBunny 16 hours ago

    I think that all humor belongs more or less to a particular time (a decade if you will). Garfield for example is very much a product of the 1980s. When humour is viewed outside of its time, it’s different. Did you read FarSide in the 1990s, or come to it later?

    • chrisweekly 7 hours ago

      IMHO Garfield is to comics / humor what Monopoly is to games / fun.

      • rkomorn 7 hours ago

        You or one of your siblings flipped the Garfield comics over after your father bled you dry with his savvy real estate plays?

  • dfedbeef 16 hours ago

    I don't think they are universally beloved or popular if that makes you any feel better.

    • dfedbeef 16 hours ago

      They're popular in the way that the Dinosaurs show on ABC was popular.

      • mk_stjames 16 hours ago

        'Dinosaurs' was a masterpiece and I won't hear otherwise.

        The series finale is one of the greatest T.V. finales of all time.

        • [removed] 7 hours ago
          [deleted]
      • fknorangesite 2 hours ago

        No, the Far Side was popular the way The Simpsons was popular.

        I think you're dramatically underestimating how big it was during its run.

somat 18 hours ago

It is interesting to note the changes in style from his newspaper comic. I assume it is the result of drawing for yourself and being able to take the time to draw it how you want rather than a 7 comic a week deadline syndicated strip.

  • normie3000 15 hours ago

    It might be explained by the long explanation on the linked page - these new cartoons are drawn on computer with a graphics tablet, whereas the old ones were pen and ink.

    • mcv 13 hours ago

      There are multiple reasons for a different style, but U think a big one is that a syndicated cartoon is expected to have a recognisable style. We recognise many cartoonists by their unique style, despite many of them being far more versatile artists than that.

  • bombcar 17 hours ago

    I think he's also directly implementing color, if you see color "original Far Side" it was added post-hock usually (though maybe some color Sunday strips exist colored by Larson).

RyanOD 5 hours ago

Fantastic! I check this periodically, hoping for anything new from Mr. Larson.

Love that he took the time to honor Ms. Goodall one more time. What a class act.

vikboyechko 19 hours ago

That’s awesome that he a digital tablet enables him to create more art. I met a comic book artist recently who was drawing nonstop even while signing autographs and talking to fans.

  • gyomu 18 hours ago

    People on here love to dump on the iPad for being a “consumption device”, and to hate on the Apple Pencil by misquoting/misunderstanding Steve Jobs[0]…

    …but if you spend any time around artists it’s evident that the iPad/Pencil/Procreate trio is one of the most significant leaps in consumer tech for visual artists of the last decade.

    [0] he never said that any and all styluses are bad - he said that 1) cell phones that 2) you can only interact with by using a stylus (not an uncommon paradigm back in 2007) were bad

    • fouc 16 hours ago

      It's crazy how much of a stranglehold the Procreate app seems to have in the iPad world for drawing.

    • fwipsy 18 hours ago

      What puts it ahead of the Wacom/Surface drawing tablets which have been around for much longer? I'm not sure if I'd describe it as a leap if it's refining existing products.

      • dgently7 16 hours ago

        Like everything apple it’s not that they made something wildly new, they just found a way to do something more polished than anyone else that then is successful with a specific subset of vocal people.

        I’m not much of a digital artist and views in this space probably vary wildly.. but if I steel man the pro iPad case I think it’s a few things 1. Screen quality. iPads look better than cintiq bc the display in the iPad is actually pretty awesome. Like recommended by the color nerds for being the best color you can get for the price, 2. Pen distance on iPad your pen is closer to the actual pixels. The cintiq had more space between the screen and the surface, feels like you draw above the page a little. 3. Biggest of all is portability. Artists love desks but they also love drawing everywhere all the time. iPad is just better at this because it’s designed as a tablet totally. The pre-apple pencil Wacom stuff existed as tablets but from what I remember was mostly just windows laptops. So software wasn’t built for touch and wanted keyboards and stuff. Responsive multitouch and the os(and drawing apps) built to integrate it tightly is a level of polish Wacom couldn’t do as just a pen input system. 4. Cost cintiqs always cost a ton and a lot of them don’t even have the computer part, iPads aren’t cheap but are way more accessible.

        Maybe Wacom has caught up with newer offerings? it’s been a while since I looked at their stuff. There are also totally reasons why you’d wanna go that route for some digital pen stuff (eg high end digital sculpture or texture painting type stuff that really needs the power and integration you can get from a desktop and desktop os)

      • gyomu 17 hours ago

        As always, Apple didn't wholesale invent a product category, but they made the first product that synthesized all the right tradeoffs in a sufficiently compelling package that enabled them to sell tens/hundreds of millions of units fairly quickly[0].

        - hardware quality wise, already the 1st gen Apple Pencil had the specs of the higher end tablets (12-bit pressure sensitivity, orientation, azimuth, all in a sleek package)

        - you can use your iPad for a bunch of other stuff too, and it's super portable - whereas for the high end tethered drawing tablets, they're pretty single purpose, and they take up a bunch of space on your desk. This all matters to broke artists living in dorm rooms/tiny apartments.

        - the Procreate team designed a tool that was really focused on the digital drawing experience and managed to make a high quality, affordable product out of it. The standard for digital drawing on those tethered tablets is mostly Photoshop, which a) is meant for tons of stuff beyond drawing, making it quite complex and b) has 4 decades of interface cruft piled up at this point.

        Honestly yeah, there truly are pre/post iPad+Pencil eras in consumer tech for anyone doing work that involves hand illustration/sketching.

        [0] whereas their competitors struggle to sell low numbers of units at terrible margins

    • vikboyechko 18 hours ago

      Yep totally, Procreate on an iPad with a paper-like screen protector and a Pencil is an amazing creative juicer.

sph 12 hours ago

I should really start to read the Far Side comic... I've heard about it for the first time, along with Heathcliff and Pants, on the latest Solar Sands video "The Surreal Worlds of Single Panel Comics": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4npsyTE-m_k

BAPHOMETA88F 14 hours ago

I had a client once in the 90's when Olive Garden was the first wave of consumer Italian spots to serve specials.

After we ordered our entrees the waiter left one of those coloring labyrinths. Well, I couldn't tell at the start of the sketch that it resembled a mandala.

As a comic book artist, his studies in a parapsychology were in the practice of comic strips.

Gary's work reminds me of that afternoon.

akoboldfrying 16 hours ago

No one is able to capture stupidity on a person's (or cow's, or chicken's) face quite like Gary Larson.

[removed] 20 hours ago
[deleted]
bbor 20 hours ago

Wow, thank you for posting (you have to click the green "Enter" button, it's not super obvious -- someone needs to have a sit-down with Gary about design conventions! It's also completely un-bookmark-able, as there's no URL leading to the latest comic every day).

This one made me laugh out loud for the first time in a while: https://www.thefarside.com/new-stuff/387/house-on-hillside He's still got it!

EDIT: Ahh, it's very, very small. I was excited by the "387" in the slug, but that seems to be meaningless (?). There's 8 total comics in no clear order, and the caption system is completely broken (it says they were all posted this past Wednesday) :(

  • hennell 18 hours ago

    I assume his idea was that you have to come through the enter page so you read the disclaimer. I don't think he really cares about design conventions or making it easy, it's a tiny outlet for him rather than a thing built for others

Mistletoe 14 hours ago

This was such a better experience on mobile. I had first tried on my MacBook and it was inscrutable.

jmclnx 21 hours ago

Very nice, I have been checking it for a while and this is the first new one I have seen in a while.

Nice cartoon for Jane Goodall!