Comment by 331c8c71
Imo the economics profession very much suffers from inferiority complex known as "physics envy".
Imo the economics profession very much suffers from inferiority complex known as "physics envy".
> Quant finance doesn't claim to be devising grand theories about how the world operates
What do you base this on?
> What's quintessential quant finance? Black-Scholes and no-arbitrage pricing
This is a bad model to pick to exemplify physics envy given it’s based on thermodynamic dispersion.
The term “physics envy” broadly applies to all social sciences lacking a mathematical basis. It’s a criticism of using math where it doesn’t belong. That hasn’t really fit (until very recently) with economics. It’s been a classic complaint about quantitative finance’s loftier visions of universality.
> economics profession very much suffers from inferiority complex known as "physics envy"
You’re mixing up quantitative finance and economics.