Comment by cs702

I disagree. The OP states in the first sentence of its "Conclusion" section:

> To conclude, there appear to be parallels between excessive toy motivation in dogs and behavioural addictions in humans.

Understandably, however, the must authors qualify and frame their conclusion, so later on they add:

> Despite the observed parallels between high-AB dogs and humans affected by behavioural addictions, we refrain from conclusively characterising high-AB dogs as exhibiting addictive behaviour, given the absence of established benchmarks or standardised criteria.