Comment by buildsjets

Comment by buildsjets 2 days ago

65 replies

Article should be titled “Heroin Addicts Who Can Afford To Support Their Habit Often Seem Normal.”

His roommate’s klepto friend sure seemed abnormal.

Also, my understanding from folk who do use is that heroin doesn’t exist in meaningful quantity in today’s market. It’s all fent. Even the stuff that claims to be h is cut with fent, and maybe xylazine if you are especially unlucky.

mattmaroon 2 days ago

This is actually why I think all recreational drugs should be legal. I know of approximately 0 people who have had the thought “I’d try heroin if it were legal”. All making it illegal does is make the supply deadly.

I truly believe that there would be fewer addicts and fewer overdoses if you could buy regulated heroin.

  • kenjackson 2 days ago

    I actually think more people would use if it were legal. Maybe not immediately but over time it would become more normalized. Regular joe character in tv shows would just use heroine. It would be available at college parties next to kegs. Etc…. And heroine companies (now that it’s legal) would find ways to market their drugs even if direct advertising isn’t legal.

    • mattmaroon 2 days ago

      I don’t think that’s true of heroin to a large extent, but I do think it would be true of cocaine, psychedelics, and other drugs. But regardless, I think the overall effect would be net harm mitigation given all the downsides of making it illegal. Funding violent crime at home and abroad, stigmatizing it and deterring treatment, overdoses from unsafe supply, etc. It’s entirely possible that more people would use it and it would still result in less harm to society.

      • sfn42 2 days ago

        I've been saying the same thing for years. Everything should be legal, prohibition just causes more problems. We learned this lesson with alcohol already.

        Making it legal we could have things sold over the counter in pharmacies with proper age checks, we could even require further checks like before you can purchase heroin you need to go through a process where it is explained how it works, what a reasonable dose is, what side effects are, how addictive it is etc.

        Same with other stuff. Most drugs are quite safe and harmless if done by people who know what they're doing. Of course self destructive people and morons would still harm themselves but honestly I'm not too worried about that. They will always find ways to harm themselves.

        At least drug users wouldn't be funding cartels and warlords etc.

    • drra 2 days ago

      It can be legal and tightly controlled at the same time. Here in my European country it's perfectly legal to prescribe opiates but after 3rd prescription (regardless of what opiate it was) a patient has to go for mandatory psychiatric evaluation. This has put potential opiate abuser on the radar in a meaningful way. Legalisation doesn't mean free for all just like alcohol.

  • Bratmon 2 days ago

    The US literally just tried that with gambling, and we discovered that making gambling legal increased the number of addicts by so much that it shows up in "total bankruptcies" statistics.

    • mattmaroon 2 days ago

      The key difference is people view heroin as something that will ruin your life, but think gambling is a harmless pass time until it is too late. There’s nobody who doesn’t know the perils of heroin, legal gambling existed in most places in some form and had for a long time. People view it much more like alcohol than heroin.

      Also we didn’t just try that with gambling (48 states have had some legal form of it forever) we just tried it with online sports books, which turn out to be a particularly virulent form of gambling. And we haven’t really begun to sensibly regulate that, a lot of harm may be reduced in the near future as we do.

      • lelanthran 2 days ago

        > The key difference is people view heroin as something that will ruin your life,

        Now they do; make it legal and in two generations it won't be viewed that way because, after all, it's legal!

      • monerozcash 2 days ago

        It's worth noting that there's a form of gambling that's exactly the same as sports betting that has been legal for much longer, the financial markets.

        • makeset a day ago

          The analogy is apt only in that financial markets are "a form of gambling" exactly as much as sports is.

    • ponector 2 days ago

      Do you expect the same amount of ads for heroin as for sport betting?

      Get your first dose for free! Refer a friend and get more free shots! Every tenth shot for free!

      • SpicyLemonZest 2 days ago

        Yes, I do. Heroin was widely advertised before it was banned, and I don’t see why those same commercial pressures wouldn’t lead to it being advertised now if it were legal. It’s not even a lie to say that it works as a cough suppressant!

    • hollandheese 2 days ago

      We also made it extremely easy to gamble. It'd be the equivalent to handing everyone a heroin replicator, so that all people had to do was press a button and heroin would instantly appear.

    • michelb 2 days ago

      Isnt that more because gambling is ingrained with American culture? It’s seems to be pretty much everywhere.

      • monerozcash 2 days ago

        Gambling as in roulette, gambling as in games of skill, or gambling as in trading?

        In the last case gambling is pretty much everywhere in all developed societies.

  • presentation 2 days ago

    One data point, I live in East Asia, it’s very illegal, and vanishingly few people have drug problems (often they substitute for other problems that are less illegal, like gambling or sex).

    • mattmaroon 2 days ago

      Well, that’s really nice, and I don’t know how you pull that off, but it doesn’t translate to western societies. It’s very illegal most places, but how much of a problem it is seems to vary by region.

      • GLdRH 2 days ago

        It doesn't translate because you don't get the death penalty for having 1g of Cannabis

    • immibis 2 days ago

      Yes, if you execute everyone who takes drugs, you won't have many drug users, but that creates a worse problem that you are executing people for taking drugs.

      • presentation a day ago

        Not every country in east Asia is Singapore, and the point I’m making is that the commenter thinking there is no way to reduce drug addiction besides extreme permissiveness has counterexamples here today. This is a failure of imagination.

  • themafia 2 days ago

    > I know of approximately 0 people who have had the thought “I’d try heroin if it were legal”.

    Perhaps it's because they weren't experiencing enough pain at the time. I think most people fall into drugs circumstantially, I'm not sure it often presents as a conscious lifestyle decision.

    > I truly believe that there would be fewer addicts and fewer overdoses if you could buy regulated heroin.

    I believe that there would be less drug use overall if our economic system wasn't as rapacious as it currently is.

  • ofrzeta 2 days ago

    It's certainly true and in civilized countries (like the Swiss I think) the state offers the possibility to have your drugs screened and you can get clean syringes. Makes so much more sense than to criminialize addicted humans.

    • Nursie 2 days ago

      In Switzerland, at the appropriate facilities, the state provides heroin to addicts.

      This has a dual effect - addicts get clean drugs and take them under medical supervision, reducing deaths, helping funnel some towards programs that will eventually get them clean etc. With this sort of support it turns out that people no longer steal to get their fix either, and can usually even hold down employment pretty well.

      But also the young folk get to see these tired, worn out, older people queuing outside the clinic in the morning to get their fix and realise hey, maybe that isn't so cool and edgy after all...

      Seems like a good plan to me, the problem is (as ever) puritans and their politicians, it's an easy thing to screech about. All it would take to kill it dead in a lot of countries would be someone standing up to shout "The opposition party want to spend YOUR tax money giving DRUGS to filthy JUNKIES!"

  • kgwgk 2 days ago

    > I know of approximately 0 people who have had the thought “I’d try heroin if it were legal”.

    How many people do you approximately know of that have had the thought “I’d try heroin”?

    > I truly believe that there would be fewer addicts and fewer overdoses if you could buy regulated heroin.

    How many people do you approximately know of that have had the thought “I’d try heroin but only because I cannot buy regulated heroin”?

    • rkomorn 2 days ago

      Also... isn't the whole opioid addiction crisis basically because people were in fact buying regulated ~heroin?

      • etempleton 2 days ago

        A lot of people in the early OOs got addicted to pills because doctors subscribed them liberally and they weren’t regulated that well in hospitals so medical staff who wanted to make an extra buck could easily steal and sell them. The government cracked down on this and then all of the pill poppers turned to heroin, which now is mostly fent.

      • johnnienaked 2 days ago

        Lol yes opiate addictions of all stripes for all time can be tied directly back to that oxycontin commercial from 1999

  • ralfd 2 days ago

    But is the reverse true? Do you know people who thought “I will try heroin because it is illegal”?

  • tayo42 2 days ago

    if anything it being legal would make it less cool

    IME most people dont want to be addicted, theyre just in a rut or life took them a certain way and just need support to get through the other side.

    People who dont use drugs are way to hysterical about drug use though to ever see real improvement.

  • dzhiurgis a day ago

    We need DRM'd heroin. If you allowed it to be bought willy-nilly unsuspecting people and kids would eventually accidentally OD on it.

  • sodafountan 2 days ago

    That's a very libertarian viewpoint of which I've always tended to agree with, drugs should be legal no matter the circumstances. I remember coming to this forum in the early days of Bitcoin which is also favored by libertarians, I wonder what the majority political viewpoint of HN is. Seems like it would skew toward the libertarian viewpoints of socioeconomics and public policy