Comment by vincent-manis

Comment by vincent-manis 3 days ago

3 replies

No, MUMPS (or M) is a remote descendant of JOSS, an interactive language of the 1950s. JOSS has all sorts of variants (DEC's FOCAL language of the 1960s was a dialect), but I think MUMPS is the only living one. MUMPS code is mostly unreadable, as the commands can be, and often are, abbreviated to the first letter. As a result, it looks a lot like line noise.

Regardless of its many warts, Cobol cannot be accused of being unreadable. Verbose, yes.

nradov 3 days ago

MUMPS was originally developed in the 1960s for use on minicomputers that had maybe 64KB RAM. At the time it was a lot more important to keep code size small, hence the single letter commands. Readability wasn't a concern then but it sure looks like a mess today.

  • vintermann a day ago

    It's hard to imagine it's an improvement over just the raw assembly.

cyberax 2 days ago

> Regardless of its many warts, Cobol cannot be accused of being unreadable. Verbose, yes.

Hence the "evil twin" comment :)