jonhohle 3 days ago

The thread topic was about terminating the life of someone suffering from dementia who likely didn’t have advanced directive. I read this comment in that context - that it would nto be voluntary, but in cases where the person couldn’t choose for themselves.

  • LorenPechtel 2 days ago

    You are assuming no advance directive. We are talking about cases where there are advanced directives.

    (Although there are cases I would be ok with it without--to me, what's important is the mind. To me personhood extends from first consciousness to last consciousness. Once you are sure the last consciousness has passed I attach no value to the body that remains.)

jkhdigital 3 days ago

There’s no bright line. Suffering is a subjective experience. Lack of prohibition is tantamount to encouragement.

  • gausswho 3 days ago

    I'm afraid that's a logical leap too far. To allow does not equate with to encourage.