Comment by henryfjordan

Comment by henryfjordan 4 days ago

4 replies

We shouldn't aim for 0 crashes due to low fuel though. How many deaths does carrying around 3x fuel than what you reasonably need contribute to via extra pollution?

We should aim for 1 every 10-100 years or something reasonable like that.

appreciatorBus 4 days ago

We should account for deaths from pollution, but if we are going to do that, we should be willing to do that for 99% of aviation fuel that has nothing to do with reserves & safety margins, in addition to fuel used to drive cars.

Any regulation short of "carry infinite fuel" will be a trade-off, and entail some risk and anyone involved in setting these knows that. Zero may not be our actual target or even possible, but it is a useful aspiration to ensure that everyone is pulling in the right direction.

hshdhdhehd 4 days ago

We dont aim for 0. Zero means dont fly. one in every 100 years globally for all flights would be very safe.

  • vdqtp3 3 days ago

    On the contrary - commercial aviation does aim for perfection.

jacquesm 3 days ago

At 3x the number of deaths would be 0 because there would be no more flights.