joegibbs 6 hours ago

God I can't stand it when I get this kind of output from Claude, they really need to train it out for Claude 5.

"[Tangentially related emoji] I have completed this fully functional addition to the project that is now working perfectly! There are now zero bugs and the system is ready for deployment to production! [Rocketship emoji]"

Then of course you test it out and it doesn't work at all! It's very grating. It would be more bearable if it hedged its claims a bit more (maybe that will negatively affect the quality of the results though - if training a model to output insecure code also makes it a murderous Hitler admirer then, since when humans hedge their output is less likely to be perfect, it may mean it pushes the model to output code that is less than perfect).

Reply View 1 reply
  • sheepscreek 3 hours ago

    > "[Tangentially related emoji] I have completed this fully functional addition to the project that is now working perfectly! There are now zero bugs and the system is ready for deployment to production! [Rocketship emoji]"

    This made me laugh so hard. Never trust an AI model saying “There are now zero bugs”! Weaponized incompetence? :)

    As a side note, I absolutely am in love with GPT-5 and GPT-5-codex. When I talk to it, it feels like talking to a peer and not an over enthusiastic (but talented) junior with potential. GPT-5-codex on high has been exceptional at debugging insidious bugs.

    Reply View 0 replies
cratermoon an hour ago

And there's at least an 80% chance one of those items is, in fact, not in the commit.

Reply View 0 replies