Comment by jcranmer

Comment by jcranmer 18 hours ago

3 replies

> The records do show that the railways were profitable for a short while, but it seems only because the government paid for the infrastructure. If they had to incur the capital expenditure themselves, the math doesn't look like it would math.

Actually, governments in the US rarely actually provided any capital to the railroads. (Some state governments did provide some of the initial capital for the earliest railroads). Most of federal largess to the railroads came in the form of land grants, but even the land grant system for the railroads was remarkably limited in scope. Only about 7-8% of the railroad mileage attracted land grants.

[removed] 16 hours ago
[deleted]
[removed] 16 hours ago
[deleted]
9rx 16 hours ago

> Actually, governments in the US rarely actually provided any capital to the railroads.

Did I, uh, miss a big news announcement today or something? Yesterday "around my parts" wasn't located in the US. It most definitely wasn't located in the US when said rail lines were built. Which you even picked up on when you recognized that the story about those lines couldn't have reasonably been about somewhere in the US. You ended on a pretty fun story so I guess there is that, but the segue into it wins the strangest thing ever posted to HN award. Congrats?