godelski 18 hours ago

If your number is seized then the new account holder has no chat history. i.e. the vault is cleared out. In that situation you will also be kicked out, clearly telling you that your account has been hijacked.

You can also lock registration of your device.

What is your security concern here?

Reply View 9 replies
  • AnonC 15 hours ago

    > You can also lock registration of your device

    Registration lock expires in seven days or less. [1]

    [1]: https://support.signal.org/hc/en-us/articles/360007059792-Si...

    Reply View 3 replies
    • godelski 13 hours ago

      Please actually read

        > Registration Lock expires after 7 days *of inactivity*
      I don't know why you dropped "of inactivity" and changed it to "or less".

      If you use signal once a week you're fine. Maybe it should be longer but that's a different argument and there's no reason to be disingenuous about it

      Reply View 2 replies
      • Aissen 11 hours ago

        It does not matter if you lose control of the number, the new person will be able to register. The 7 days period is for you to get control of the number back or make sure all your contacts know about the issue.

        Reply View 0 replies
      • bratwurst3000 7 hours ago

        am I reading it wrong? but on my phone if i activate reglock again it says that if pin fails the account is blocked for seven days. I asume that after 7 days one still needs the pin to register or am i wrong?

        Reply View 0 replies
  • beeflet 17 hours ago

    Impersonation, MITM attack

    Reply View 4 replies
    • mandevil 17 hours ago

      If you have done the out-of-band safety number verification, then impersonation attempts will give you a warning that their safety number has changed. I know this because I got that error when my wife replaced her cell phone.

      I believe (though I haven't verified it myself) that even if you haven't verified the numbers using an out-of-band exchange mechanism, you will get a warning if the safety number as observed by their server changes. I believe they would need to know your Signal PIN to restore from backup, which means that even if you've set that it will give an alert, presuming basic security competence from the people you are conversing with.

      Reply View 2 replies
      • AnonC 15 hours ago

        > If you have done the out-of-band safety number verification

        I personally have never seen anyone do this, even when they’re supposed to do it right from the very beginning. So practically this is of very little value to most of the user base.

        Reply View 0 replies
      • vel0city 14 hours ago

        You get notifications if the safety number gets changed from a device change either way. But doing the in person validation helps ensure that particular safety number you received was actually their safety number and not a MitM on first contact.

        Reply View 0 replies
    • godelski 16 hours ago

        > Impersonation
      Yes, but with a canary. Would you rather not have a canary? The other person also receives a warning that the verification number has changed. It's not like the existence of a phone number is what creates the ability to hijack an account. And again, you can do registration locking so that solves that problem.

      You can also do verification of your contacts. Best done in person where you can check the keys.

        > MITM attack
      I don't think that means what you think it means. Who is in the middle? This is E2EE
      Reply View 0 replies
bratwurst3000 7 hours ago

for this reason there is the signal pin. they need pin and phonenumber to hijack the account. afaik

Reply View 0 replies