Ask HN: Went to prison for 18 months, lost access to my GitHub. What can I do?

90 points by joshmn 15 hours ago

77 comments

Hi friends,

The skinny is this: I went to prison, all my personal items were stolen IRL and the same person changed a bunch of my passwords. Subsequently, I can't recover my GitHub account.

I have recovered most of my digital assets by proving I am me. Recovering my GitHub has proven to be more painful than Google's treatment regarding my Google Workspace.

I have the original phone number associated with my account, and can verify a bunch of private repos that are associated with my account—even the number of commits on one of them (almost 6900). I can't, however, provide any 2FA codes or backup codes because they are printed on paper that has, I assume, been destroyed.

I maintain two relatively popular Ruby packages that have gone stale since I've been gone, and there are projects my GitHub there that I was working on prior to my incarceration—including a SaaS I had hoped to launch post-prison and two books I was ready to publish. Having said, just opening another account isn't exactly the option I want to take.

I've opened a ticket, but I'm getting the "shit out of luck because we don't know you are you" treatment. I understand that security is important, but if one can prove they are them, what's the point?

Are there other avenues I have that I haven't explored yet?

abxyz 13 hours ago

> I can't, however, provide any 2FA codes or backup codes because they are printed on paper that has, I assume, been destroyed.

The situation you are in is very unfortunate and I am sympathetic but in GitHub's defence, this is exactly what I hope would happen when I enable 2FA. I would be very perturbed to find out that GitHub would grant access to my account given identity documents. There are some creative solutions (e.g: a countdown to the reset with progressively more aggressive email notifications to ensure the account holder is aware) but even they are problematic. So, this sucks, but it's the price we pay for security.

  • joshmn 13 hours ago

    That's the same stance I have and why I'm torn. The little quirk here—where it makes slightly more sense—is that they received a legal notice at one point (from the US Government) about my account, there are plenty of online articles to corroborate me as me, and I have a fancy prison release ID that can help me identify me. Unfortunately this context is probably lost on the individuals who work their Zendesk.

    The policies are rather draconian as others have mentioned. Anyone could be the victim of theft; mine just has an awkward paper trail attached to it.

    • abxyz 13 hours ago

      I think the disconnect between you and GitHub support is that you're positioning this as a problem of proving your identity whereas for GitHub support it is a policy. The GitHub policy is: you lose your 2FA, you lose your account. Verifying your identity is not relevant. GitHub provides extensive tooling to protect your account (multiple methods of 2FA, recovery codes etc.) and so from their perspective, while this is deeply unfortunate, the policy is very clear and allowing you access to the account would be a major security issue (not for your account specifically, but for GitHub as an organization).

      edit: https://docs.github.com/en/site-policy/other-site-policies/g...

      • ryandrake 13 hours ago

        These (for good reason) draconian policies are the reason I am still hesitant to embrace 2FA. I understand the significant improvement in your security posture, and I would not want someone not-me to be able to reset my credentials. But the failure mode is just too catastrophic. You lose one thing and you are shit out of luck.

        We need something better. I don't know what it would be.

      • michaelmior 13 hours ago

        Part of the problem here is that there is no prior association of an identity with an account. So proving who you are is somewhat irrelevant since even if the account has your name, email, and photo, that's no guarantee that the account was created by you. If identity verification were required ahead of time, then perhaps verifying identity after loss of access could be reasonable recovery method. But of course there are many reasons why requiring such verification is problematic.

      • amatecha 13 hours ago

        Someone high enough in the food chain at GitHub can override that policy at their whim. I have personally had my day saved by that very "loophole" in another "lost access to an online service" situation in the past.

      • MrGilbert 13 hours ago

        I'd assume that there is simply no "ok, this individual got released from prison and can proof everything" policy in place, and that might be the real issue here. Big organizations begin to tumble once you request something where there are no policies in place.

    • hluska 13 hours ago

      I’m not sure that blaming tech support for not understanding context is the best approach here. The other sides of that context, which are understandable from their point of view, is that you were charged with some serious crimes. There’s a large delta between the charges and the conviction, but you’ve got some scary words written about you online. Secondarily, GitHub has policy so whereas you’re coming at it from a position of being correct, they’re in a position where they have to break policy. That’s a big risk.

      Your best bet would likely be legal. US Federal law imposes some strict rules on lawyers for identity verification to combat money laundering so attorneys have a legally recognized toolkit to verify identity. Having a third party who works for you in the mix could help. Though again, it would involve breaking their policy so this would be a decision made several layers above Zendesk access.

      Otherwise, I think this is doing precisely what 2FA is meant to do. It’s not okay for you and you’ve clearly lost a lot because of this, but with the current threat environment, GitHub has to be very careful especially with 2FA. From their point of view, there likely isn’t that big of a gap between your interactions and interactions with people who are trying to take over accounts. A lawyer may not work, but it sure changes that equation.

  • zerr 13 hours ago

    The person should be able to walk in the service provider's office and get an in-person help, restoration of access, by presenting ID docs.

  • kramer2718 12 hours ago

    I agree that simply emailing in copies of identity documents after the fact shouldn't be sufficient. However, there should be a verification process that includes verification of identity documents through legal means, including perhaps a processing fee. The fee would preclude many attackers from even trying to break this process.

    Maybe this would only work for new accounts as you'd probably need to provide identity information on before losing access.

  • Retr0id 13 hours ago

    As a matter of policy, sure. But at the same time, I bet there are some GitHub employees reading this that would be in a position to pull some strings and make an exception. For OP's sake, I hope I'm right!

the__alchemist 13 hours ago

I'm perpetually worried (and partially prepared) for this sort of scenario, as more of my accounts require 2FA. I dread the day I lose or break my phone, have my items stolen, there's a weather disaster etc. I try to make my hobby repos public and/or backed up in multiple places as a hedge.

  • commandersaki 9 hours ago

    All my digital life is sorted with a password manager that sync's in a cloud (I know some consider this an anti-feature). I guess OP probably had to disclose information to someone (s)he trusts when going to prison and that trust was abused.

  • jopsen 11 hours ago

    Print out 2FA codes and bury them somewhere.

    It's not that hard, and you feel like a proper spy doing it ;)

    • vorpalhex 10 hours ago

      Please don't depend on this. Paper does not like moisture and soil is full of it.

      Use an escrow or custodian (lawyer, bank, etc).

  • zdragnar 13 hours ago

    Yubikey in a safe deposit box is about as good as we can get, at least for the services that allow it.

    • Arrowmaster 9 hours ago

      The problem with this tactic is the need to go get the Yubikey every time you make a new account.

      • 1attice 5 hours ago

        Actually, this is now a solved problem. Root-of-trust pattern.

        - Use Bitwarden or similar

        - Set BW to recognize the Yubikey as one (of several, incl. TOTP ('Authenticator') code) second factor.

        - On all other sites and services, generate passkeys (which are essentially virtual yubikeys) and save them in BW.

        - In BW, save the password and TOTP. BW itself, on another device (or in a separate incarnation - e.g. the desktop app when authenticating the browser extension) is now your everyday means of authenticating to BW.

        - BW-stored passkey is now your standard means of authentication for e.g. GitHub, Google, etc

        - Put the yubikey in a safety deposit box

        - Bravo, you have a very professional trust system

    • aitchnyu 11 hours ago

      Can we use multiple Yubikeys for a service?

      • kameit00 10 hours ago

        I use 2 yubikeys. I registered both on multiple services. So… yes, it is possible. One key is a backup if the other key stops working.

  • [removed] 12 hours ago
    [deleted]
  • IlikeKitties 13 hours ago

    Just do as I do and keep all the 2FA TOTP Codes in your keepass.

  • manbash 13 hours ago

    Don't you have a 2FA Recovery Code?

    • georgel 13 hours ago

      Far too many of the critical services (banks) still only offer SMS 2FA.

jackconsidine 13 hours ago

FWIW I had a similar conundrum with Slack. I had set-up my business Slack workspace in college; 4 years after graduation my university changed policies (they used to forward name@edu => name@alumni.edu).

I tried the normal means (support tickets etc) to no avail. The third or fourth time I got someone in account recovery. There was a very formal process for verifying my identity (I'm sure based on the process this happens all the time). Eventually I they helped me recover my account. It probably took a few months on the whole, but once I got the right support rep it was only a week or so.

So my advice would be to submit more tickets. Because they might have a process that not all support agents know about, and some are more helpful than others.

qafy 14 hours ago

unfortunately, the techniques you are trying in order to get access to a dormant Github account are EXACTLY the same ones that github gets spammed with every day by bad actors attempting supply chain attacks. You don't have anything that proves your identity any more than any rando on the internet in Github's eyes at least. Everything you have presented here may be convincing enough to me, but probably not to GitHub's opsec policies.

  • jopsen 11 hours ago

    Also suppose you Facebook account was compromised, that bad, sad for the person affected. May cause some media attention if the person was famous.

    But if the right GitHub account is compromised, we could see massive supply chain issues. Or a big important web service with millions of users affected.

    The downside of making a wrong call here is just really really big.

    There are real businesses being deployed from GitHub.

xwowsersx 13 hours ago

Thoughts of the top of my head:

- If the most important thing is control of the Ruby gems, reach out to RubyGems.org support

- for your projects, if you have are past collaborators on those repos, they can sometimes open GH tickets referencing the project and vouch for you. Doesn't guarantee success, but adds weight

- GH (being part of MSFT) does have some channels for escalated identity verification. Lawyers or notarized ID may be needed...possibly expensive, but sometimes the only way

GH support is extremely strict on account recovery once 2FA/backup codes are gone. I wish you luck!

  • joshmn 13 hours ago

    I was able to recover my Rubygems account :); unfortunately my projects were all private and solo :(; I am currently looking into lawyers—if anyone has any recommendations here my inbox is open.

    • pjjpo 5 hours ago

      I haven't used Rubygems before but doesn't it allow publishing from a new repo? pypi allows updating publishing configs.

      A repo fork (and maybe more so the GitHub identify fork) is definitely not ideal but if your users can get updates to their packages, maybe it's best to move forward as well as possible.

      • pjjpo 5 hours ago

        I also imagine the identity proof for asking GH support to archive the old repo would be lighter than for recovering an account entirely.

devoutsalsa 12 hours ago

What you might consider doing is try contacting Ruby Central, or whoever it is that runs Ruby Gems. Even if they can't/won't give you access to the account, I'm wondering if they could/would freeze publishing updates to these gems until the account "owner" proves they are who they say they are. That way they don't risk giving control to someone who is hard to verify (you) and they prevent malware from being uploaded by the person who now controls your email until they verify the you are (which obviously they shouldn't be able to do).

bogwog 13 hours ago

> all my personal items were stolen IRL and the same person changed a bunch of my passwords.

Have you filed a police report? Do you know who this person is? Getting your stuff back might be easier than dealing with github support.

heldrida 13 hours ago

There are alarming statistics about phone snatching in London. Plus, we are NOT OUR PHONES. Doesn't GitHub have a way for people to verify and prove somebody's identity? Given that's a fact, isn't it best to disable 2FA and stop recommending it to people?

Following this post, I have reviewed all my main accounts, created recovery codes, set up backups, and added alternative email addresses, among other tasks. Hope for the best.

lesuorac 12 hours ago

I wonder if you can make a creative small claims court claim against them.

Denying access to some repo where you spent x hours on which can be resolved by them paying you y dollars * x hours. And then hoping a lawyer takes pitty on you and restores the account?

  • heldrida 12 hours ago

    That's a good idea!

    I've been thinking about how they could solve this, since they accept payments; wouldn't it be possible to request a payment with a specific reference code to verify the identity? Paired with any other required identification process, documentation, etc.

    • lesuorac 10 hours ago

      IIUC, the issue is not that they can't verify OP. It's that there is a policy decision not to restore access.

      So you have to work around the policy issue.

__alexander 13 hours ago

Why not create a new account and fork your old repositories? You can restart with updating your old projects and overtime you’d build back up that reputation. I’d also add a note that you were the previous author and lost access to the repositories.

didgetmaster 6 hours ago

It sounds like you trusted someone you shouldn't have. This person wouldn't happen to be someone who also has spent some time in prison?

clamprecht 13 hours ago

Is there a phone number associated with the account? How does GitHub want you to prove that you're you?

  • joshmn 13 hours ago

    There is, but it's not a phone number I have access to anymore. I changed it to the said person's phone number before I surrendered so that this exact scenario did not happen. I trusted the wrong person.

    • tasuki 13 hours ago

      > I trusted the wrong person.

      This hits me hard. So you went to prison, and the person you trusted the most... turned out not to be trustworthy. Please hang in there and hope you meet (or have met already?) people you can rely on!

      I'm very grateful for the many people in my life I can absolutely rely on.

    • anonymousiam 13 hours ago

      Seems like you could present this evidence to the police for an identity theft charge against the "wrong person." Or you could threaten to do so, and perhaps regain your property.

      • clort 12 hours ago

        Except, read the comment again - Josh changed the account so that it referenced the other persons phone number. They did not steal his phone, and it could be framed that he gave them the account.

        Accusing somebody of theft? Perhaps the police would side with the non-felon..

        • anonymousiam 2 hours ago

          There's no dispute that he provided his telephone number, the dispute would be over the ownership of the GitHub account, which is a separate item, and perhaps still registered in his name. Without additional details, we're both guessing.

    • ldargin 11 hours ago

      You might want a lawyer's help to get that person to assist. Perhaps through an agreement not to sue for past wrongs, and maybe with a payment.

johtso 13 hours ago

Maybe, depending on where you are in the world, you could make some kind of GDPR request to get access to your data, even if you don't recover your account?

6stringmerc 12 hours ago

WELCOME TO TANGENTIAL INJUSTICE!

Lost access to my phone, then went to Tarrant County jail awaiting trail (innocent until proven guilty but $250,000 bond where no humans or property harmed), and only was able to get a few G-M-@-1-L related accounts reset following a plea bargain to get back my freedom. Lots of corpses in that system. IYKYK.

What can you do? Ask nicely. Hope to escalate. First off though, think of Jack Handey...

If you lost your keys in lava, man, let 'em go, they're gone.

liquidise 13 hours ago

I haven't any help to offer, but want to say that this post along with reading your site the other day has shown a level of composure and resiliency that i aspire to.

Good luck getting your access back.

bena 13 hours ago

Do you personally know the person who stole all of your items and accounts?

I understand if you can't get or won't get in contact with them, but I'm curious as to whether this was a random or someone taking advantage of you.

Edit: Nevermind, I saw your response to someone else.

CPLX 13 hours ago

You could initiate some kind of legal action to access your data. You'd need a lawyer.

I think it's likely that you wouldn't have legal grounds to force them to give you your data but it's an approach that would most certainly get their attention at a higher level than anything you're able to do from a customer service perspective.

You'd have to have some legal argument as to why they could be obligated to produce the records under subpoena but the standards for that could be quite low.

apwell23 13 hours ago

thief changed your github password? why? how did he get get access to your github account ?

logicallee 13 hours ago

[flagged]

  • techbro92 12 hours ago

    You sound paranoid and schizophrenic you should honestly try explaining your situation to someone you know or a professional. I think you’ll realize that your thinking is a bit delusional. I can’t really understand what you’re saying here.

    • tptacek 12 hours ago

      Don't do this. We don't diagnose people on HN. Just flag the comment and move on, or, if you're worried, mail hn@yc.

      https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...

      (I'm not a mod, just someone who cares a lot about this particular rule.)

      • logicallee 12 hours ago

        The profile you responded to "techbro" was made 3 years ago, has 102 karma (i.e. 1 upvote every 10 days, on average), and has never submitted anything - zero submitted articles or profiles. My profile was made 12 years ago and has 3,118 karma (approximately averaging an upvote every 1.4 days) including lots of submissions of stuff I made, for example this Show HN that I was pleased to see make it to the front page with 36 points and lots of positive comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43141139 (the resource itself is currently offline as I've temporarily replaced my website with 50 reasons why it's wrong to disrupt communications between a husband and wife. I'll replace my website as soon as this issue is solved.)

        Right up your alley, I've actually written a cryptographic case study of some of the dynamics of this, I've just sent you a copy of it (you and I were in touch before - it was very well reviewed by professional cryptographers.) In your reply to this, please acknowledge your receipt of my email, and if you can, print it out as well, as it can become inaccessible later.

        Of course, there are a lot of NSA-affiliated people who could come out of the woodworks to support parent's slander that I "sound paranoid and schizophrenic".

        The reason they don't? They're witnesses in the FBI case and don't want to go to prison themselves. The FBI has already handwritten over 10,000 affidavits in this case. (They are writing by hand to avoid electronic tampering with evidence.)

        I am not making a media story about it yet, which would be the next step, so there are no articles about this yet.

        My reason for not doing so is not to bring extra attention to the case, but simply to solve it in a straightforward and expedient manner.