Comment by imiric

Comment by imiric 8 hours ago

3 replies

Modern hardware in conjunction with smart software choices can be very capable, but it's pretty negligent to run a service people depend on with such limited resources.

Sure, not every site needs to run on a highly-available elastic cluster of nodes, but the alternative mindset of actively rejecting this architecture is arguably even more harmful.

A healthy deployment should be able to scale up and down easily, if not automatically. I wouldn't want to be woken up at 3am because prod1 needs a CPU/RAM/disk increase and a reboot, and the users wouldn't like that either.

ku1ik 7 hours ago

There’s few reasons for this. First, I don’t have infinite budget for this, in fact the budget is close to 0 (sponsorships and donations help). Second, the servers are sponsored by Brightbox, and I’ve been running asciinema.org there for over a decade because BB is reliable and they’re great chaps, but I don’t have infinite resources available there. Finally, I don’t want devops complexity in my side projects.

arccy 7 hours ago

> service people depend on

why wouldn't you cap a free service? imo it's more irresponsible to demand other people keep a thing you don't pay for running just because you happen to depend on it.

phaer 8 hours ago

Sounds preferable compared to be woken up at 5 am by your cloud providers billing alert.