Comment by srean

Comment by srean 20 hours ago

4 replies

> The article shows this graphically, but there is no formal proof (although the Adler & Tanton paper is mentioned).

Well, if that interested you, you could have downloaded the paper and read it. To me your comment sounds a shade entitled, as if the blog author is under an obligation to do all the work. Sometimes one has to do the work themselves.

whyandgrowth 20 hours ago

If the author had provided links to explanations or additional materials for those who want to understand the formal reasoning more deeply.

  • dpassens 20 hours ago

    And why does the linked paper not qualify as such a link?

    • whyandgrowth 18 hours ago

      Good point. I just thought that a direct link or summary of the formal reasoning would have made it easier for readers unfamiliar with the topic. But fair enough, the linked paper does cover it.