Comment by chermi Comment by chermi 7 hours ago 3 replies Copy Link View on Hacker News Why not not both?
Copy Link theptip 7 hours ago Collapse Comment - Sure, but one comes first. Reply View | 2 replies Copy Link jayd16 6 hours ago Parent Collapse Comment - And it's going to end up being price. Reply View | 1 reply Copy Link theptip 6 hours ago Root Parent Collapse Comment - I don’t follow. If nuclear initially costs more than coal, then the first effect as it decreases is displacement when the prices cross over. Then if it falls further you will notice consumer price drops. Reply View | 0 replies
Copy Link jayd16 6 hours ago Parent Collapse Comment - And it's going to end up being price. Reply View | 1 reply Copy Link theptip 6 hours ago Root Parent Collapse Comment - I don’t follow. If nuclear initially costs more than coal, then the first effect as it decreases is displacement when the prices cross over. Then if it falls further you will notice consumer price drops. Reply View | 0 replies
Copy Link theptip 6 hours ago Root Parent Collapse Comment - I don’t follow. If nuclear initially costs more than coal, then the first effect as it decreases is displacement when the prices cross over. Then if it falls further you will notice consumer price drops. Reply View | 0 replies
Sure, but one comes first.