Comment by beeflet

Comment by beeflet 8 hours ago

5 replies

It can be cheaper to run a nuclear plant than a conventional power plant, due to lower fuel costs. But what kills nuclear is the capital costs of building the plant. It takes a while to reap the reward

bryanlarsen 8 hours ago

I'm talking about capital costs, not operating costs. $3B/GW for a coal plant is about 5X as much as natgas.

s1mplicissimus 7 hours ago

Does that calculation include the cost of storing the nuclear waste after use? I'd be curious to see a reference for your claim.

  • epistasis 6 hours ago

    Dry casting on site is fairly cheap.

    The true cost of nuclear is the massive construction cost. We don't know how to solve that.

  • Llamamoe 6 hours ago

    You need to look up how much nuclear waste is actually produced. It's a minuscule amount relative to the energy produced, and it doesn't actually need more than to be transported and then encased in concrete.

    • Jedd 4 hours ago

      It's not the volume of the waste that's the challenge - it's handling and storage that remain mostly unsolved.

      By unsolved I mean - not convincingly solved, and certainly not yet tested over the expected duration that material needs to be safely contained.