Comment by dataflow

Comment by dataflow 15 hours ago

5 replies

My beef with someone using a constraint solver here is that they almost certainly wouldn't be able to guarantee anything about their solution other than that, if it produces an output, it will be correct. They won't be able to guarantee running time, space usage, or (probably for most tools) even a useful progress indicator. The problem isn't merely that they used another tool - the problem is that they abstracted away critical details. Had they provided a handwritten solution from scratch with the same characteristics, it would've exhibited the same problems.

This doesn't mean they can't provide a constraint solver solution, but if they do, they'd better be prepared to address the obvious follow-ups. If they're prepared to give an efficient solution afterward in the time left, then more power to them.

Der_Einzige 15 hours ago

[flagged]

  • dataflow 9 hours ago

    > First of all, Nice ChatGPT response

    What the heck are you talking about? I didn't even visit ChatGPT today.

  • CamperBob2 14 hours ago

    That's an en-dash, not an em-dash

    • Der_Einzige 13 hours ago

      "It's not X, It's Y"

      • graynk 10 hours ago

        I don't think someone with an account from 2012 and 20k karma would be posting LLM-generated comments. It also doesn't read as one. It doesn't even use the "it's not x it's y" formula, it contraposes things against each other. Like I just did.