garciasn 17 hours ago

An interesting what-if scenario; but, let's assume Sanders won and all else remained largely the same as it has:

Unless the Sanders Administration had a very favorable or majority Democrat Congress aligned with his progressive wing, many proposals would be outright blocked or heavily compromised. Knowing our limitation that everything else has stayed largely the same as history since, this wouldn't be the case. The hypothetical administration's attempts at sweeping reforms, such as healthcare and climate regulation, would very likely be significantly curtailed or overturned by courts or constrained by constitutional limits on separation. The GOP, even though they actively outspend Democrats when in power, obstruct via financial limits each and every Democratic-led effort while crowing about expansion of debt incursion; as such, spending on Bernie's proposed initiatives would raise concerns about deficits, inflation, and taxation. Even with tax increases, there would be pushback from wealthy individuals, corporations, and lobbyists.

Basically, nothing would change in any significant way except, perhaps, the SCOTUS would not be outright overturning DECADES of 'settled law' in favor of an absurd view of the world as it was hundreds of years ago.

  • smallmancontrov 17 hours ago

    Yes. There are a few moments when Biden floated something that sounded like a promise made to Bernie and it got laughed out of congress by both sides of the aisle. The "capital gains income is income" proposal is probably the cleanest example. There would have been more of that and not a lot done. To make real change, you need congress on board and possibly the courts too.

  • ta1243 15 hours ago

    > Unless the Sanders Administration had a very favorable or majority Democrat Congress aligned with his progressive wing, many proposals would be outright blocked or heavily compromised

    This is a feature, and why Trump's second term is so different to his first, or Bidens, or Obamas, or Bush, or Nixon. You'd probably have to go back to FDR for such sweeping changes to the US state.

    Trumps first term was overturning norms in behavior, but not overturning the way the entire governing system works, all four estates.

bluGill 17 hours ago

Many people will imagine things. However history constantly suggests that most of those are very different from the reality that results.

The good news is when your candidate loses you don't find out the evil they really do and you can say it is not your fault. The bad news is you don't find out what is bad about the things you think are good.

  • bluSCALE4 17 hours ago

    Sanders is gutless and acts like the Democrats are the greater of the two evils even as they silenced him and prevented from being their front runner.

Aunche 17 hours ago

Just because a politician does the most virtue signaling towards the left doesn't mean that they'll produce the most progressive results. Bernie has a very poor track record of coalition building. He was getting into fights with Manchin even though he was needed as the 50th vote for the American Rescue Plan and Inflation Reduction Act.

palmfacehn 16 hours ago

He's never been a champion of financial freedom on an individual basis. He's consistently advocated for deeper and more intrusive regulations on cryptocurrencies.

PleasureBot 16 hours ago

Probably very similar unfortunately. The current state of US politics is that any policy further than center or maybe slightly left of center has a snowball's chance in hell of making it through Congress. The best case scenarios is probably what Biden accomplished: temporarily pausing the slide into far-right authoritarianism. Maybe he's able to pass some extremely watered down version of health care reform or tax reform but that seems unlikely. Certainly nothing like true progressive platform he ran on is possible in the US right now.

bongodongobob 17 hours ago

Yes, it would have been 4 years of zero progress because he would have been stonewalled by both parties.

  • AngryData 15 hours ago

    That still sounds like a dream compared to everything else we have seen done.

  • disgruntledphd2 17 hours ago

    I think the big difference would have been around Covid. The Trump administration really, really dropped the ball there, and a potential Sanders administration might have done better (i.e. invested money in preventing it from getting out of Asia, as was done for SARS 1).

    Now, that might not have worked but anything might have had a pretty large impact on global/US deaths.

  • [removed] 16 hours ago
    [deleted]
dboreham 15 hours ago

I'm guessing similar to the Obama administration. E.g. he couldn't get proper healthcare reform passed.

blindriver 17 hours ago

He was sabotaged by the DNC. Even Elizabeth Warren said that the nomination process was rigged by the DNC. Absolute corruption and the world would absolutely be a different place.

But his support of ratcheting up the Ukraine war disappointed profoundly. That’s not the Bernie I would have voted for.

  • DanHulton 17 hours ago

    Alternatively, it could have been over long ago with a lot less loss of life, if Ukraine had been supported more full-throatedly, instead of allowing to drag on as it has.

    Sometimes you gotta rip that bandaid off.

  • ActorNightly 16 hours ago

    That has been disproven. He ran again in primaries during 2020 and did horribly there. The progressives are just not popular, and they don't really do much to work with the rest of the Democrats. Unlike Republicans, where the party forerunner basically gets unilateral support from everyone Republican including those he personally insulted or harmed.

  • [removed] 17 hours ago
    [deleted]
  • CamperBob2 8 hours ago

    Sanders is old enough to remember what appeasement leads to, that's all.

  • throawaywpg 15 hours ago

    supporting Ukraine has always been in America's interests. How embarassing it must be for Trump to be publicly humiliated by Putin over a cease fire.