Comment by lucumo

Comment by lucumo 10 hours ago

3 replies

Neither you nor the blog posts author had heard of that before that ridiculous GitHub issue from yesterday. You're all using the exact same link to the exact same page. This is intellectual dishonesty from you, the blog post author and the issue reporter.

Anyone who has read the response to the reporter knows that this is a cherry-picked alternative format. The normal format is an HTML5 page. Search engines just return that instead, so the only way to have found this page is by clicking through that.

sunaookami 9 hours ago

So "it doesn't matter because other people already posted this example"?

  • johncolanduoni an hour ago

    I think their point was that for everything the US congress makes available through client-rendered XSLT, they already also do the transformation on their side and serve the HTML under another page. Which I think is part of Google’s point - you can just compile the XSLT offline once (or during your release process) and provide the same experience without rewriting anything.

  • lucumo 5 hours ago

    Is your intellectual dishonesty professional, or just a hobby?