Comment by ktallett
Are you giving the LLM your code and letting it add a new feature to see how it works? Or what?
How successful do you find your method?
Would you recode what you introduced using the LLM?
Are you giving the LLM your code and letting it add a new feature to see how it works? Or what?
How successful do you find your method?
Would you recode what you introduced using the LLM?
Yeah I let the LLM look at the code and ask it to implement some change.
It works pretty well with Claude Code. Much better than cursor, which is a step up from copilot. Even with the same models, and I'm not sure why. I haven't really tweaked much around the AI tools, since I don't really know much about how they work.
I've just found that Claude Code somehow... just works. Out of the box, no MCPs, no fancy configs. I just straight up tell it what I want, and most of the time it gets it right or close enough to right that a second instruction is all I need.
Would I recode what I wrote? Maybe not from the ground up, since I already had a pretty good framework. But LLM has managed to make some pretty fiddly changes to my codebase recently. It would have taken me a long time, mostly in tedious edits.