Comment by shkkmo

Comment by shkkmo 12 hours ago

7 replies

We think flat earthers are crazy because it is a fairly trivial thing to prove them wrong. If you believe something that is that easily disproved AND widely understood to be so, there is clearly something wrong with you.

[removed] 9 hours ago
[deleted]
throwaway290 10 hours ago

We don't think that people who think there's a bearded man in heaven are crazy, even if that's crazier than thinking earth is flat.

We don't think they are crazy because they are not 1%, they are majority.

Most people think flat earthers are crazy not because they proved them wrong. Just most people around them think flat earthers are crazy and that's enough.

  • Loughla 10 hours ago

    No we think flat earthers are crazy because it's trivial to prove wrong, whereas religious belief is a matter of faith that can't really be proven one way or the other, regardless of how silly the belief is.

    They're just different.

    • immibis 5 hours ago

      There is no way to prove that the earth isn't actually flat but every observation conspires to make it look round. For instance some flat earthers say that the atmosphere reflects light in the exact way that makes it look round.

      Take any phenomena on a globe earth, describe the exact same thing in flat earth coordinates and then say that everything weird in the equations is a new physical effect you just discovered.

      • JumpCrisscross 2 hours ago

        > describe the exact same thing in flat earth coordinates and then say that everything weird in the equations is a new physical effect you just discovered

        …which have other consequences that are easily disproven.

        Flat earthers are empirical cosplayers. It mostly seems they just want something to argue about and couldn’t come up with anything original.

      • pcthrowaway 3 hours ago

        I don't believe I've seen a flat earther explanation of foucalt's pendulum yet, but perhaps they have one

      • shadowgovt 5 hours ago

        That's a void argument.

        If every observation conspires to make it look round, it's round because observation is all we have. Refusing to accept observational evidence that forms a coherent explanation is either anti-science or anti-definition-of-words. This justification for flat earth exits the realm of scientific inquiry and enters the realm of Cartesian evil demons, a hypothesis even Descartes rejected.