Comment by Scramblejams

Comment by Scramblejams 18 hours ago

7 replies

> doesn't actually stop cheaters.

doesn't actually stop all cheaters.

We could have a better discussion around this if we recognize that failing to stop 100% of something isn't a prerequisite to rigorously evaluating the tradeoffs.

trehalose 17 hours ago

Doesn't actually stop all cheat developers. If even one person develops and sells a cheat that the kernel-level anticheat doesn't catch, then it stops 0% of cheaters from buying and using the cheat.

  • pharrington 16 hours ago

    It makes the cheats more valuable on the black market. I'm fairly sure the only people cheating in the major competitive games with anticheat are whales and extremely unethical pro players.

    • baby_souffle 15 hours ago

      If that's the case then why not only have kernel level anti-cheat enforced for the leagues and the tournaments?

      • charcircuit 2 hours ago

        Because then a lot more people would cheat outside of leagues and tournaments.

gellybeans 17 hours ago

I think the problem with this line of reasoning is that it's one-sided. Essentially you are saying "Just trust me bro" on behalf of a self-evaluating company.

I'd argue the potential for abuse is a perfectly reasonable discussion to have, and doesn't have much bearing on the effectiveness of anticheat, but I understand that's not the point you are trying to make.

  • Scramblejams 15 hours ago

    Sorry, my writing should have been clearer, I put one too many negatives in. :-)

    I didn't claim we should trust the company. Whether we can trust the anticheat maker is certainly part of the rigorous evaluation of the tradeoffs I mentioned. My point was that saying "it doesn't stop cheaters" is both incorrect and stifling to a more productive conversation, because it implies anticheat has no value and is therefore worth no risk.

    As for me, if Gabe said "now you can opt your Steam Deck in to a trusted kernel we ship with anticheat and play PUBG," I'd probably do it. But that's because I, for better or worse, tend to trust Gabe. If Tencent were shipping it, I'd probably feel differently.

    • YokoZar 14 hours ago

      Compare: "I still get spam, therefore all these anti-spam measures are worthless"

      It is absolutely the case that there would be more cheating if we turned off the only partially effective systems. We know this because they are regularly stopping and banning people!