wakawaka28 19 hours ago

Or a virtual machine...

  • superb_dev 19 hours ago

    And with PCIe pass through you can get near bare metal performance. You won’t be able to play Valorant though

  • Gigachad 18 hours ago

    Anti cheat won't run in a VM

    • dylan604 16 hours ago

      Flip it. Run the games on bare metal with nothing on it but games and a VM. use the VM for your personal system.

      • Hackbraten 15 hours ago

        That achieves nothing. A hypervisor can see and manipulate any VM it runs. By extension, a compromised kernel can do the same.

    • wakawaka28 18 hours ago

      Why not?

      • Gigachad 16 hours ago

        Because anti cheat want's to verify that the highest levels of the system are not being tampered with. When contained within a VM it's impossible to tell if some cheating script on the host OS is reading or tampering with the game memory.

        Probably the only workable solution is for windows to provide some kind of secure game mode where the game and only the game runs and can have windows attest nothing else is running. But that anti cheat has no access to the data in the real work OS which is currently not running. Ruins multi tasking, but assuming you can switch over fast enough it might not be too bad.

      • kaladin-jasnah 17 hours ago

        I've read that they specifically look for this by finding RDTSC timestamps, which would include (?) the overhead of the hypercall or something.

      • dandersch 17 hours ago

        It can work on a vm, but for Valorant specifically it seems that detecting a vm triggers the anticheat and gets you banned. I believe this is the case for most anticheats except VAC. You can try to evade the detection, but then you just enter the same cat & mouse game as a cheater. Whether allowing/disallowing VMs actually cuts down on cheaters? I don't know.