Comment by keb_

Comment by keb_ 5 days ago

9 replies

Yeah, as others already mentioned, I think they sat on their laurels for a bit too long and let VSCode overtake it.

For what it's worth, I went from ST3 -> VSCode -> ST4, and have been happy since. I've found that I prefer my text editor with minimal extensions, and with Sublime Text's LSP Plugin, I'm pretty content. The performance and customizable UI make it more worth it to me than VSCode.

WD-42 5 days ago

It's the LSP plugin that finally drove me to leave ST4 for Zed. Language integration is table stakes for an editor now. The fact that ST support is behind a volunteer plugin instead of integrated directly in the editor just means it's never going to be as good as a editor that does have first class support. The ST devs need to actually improve the editor, but I haven't seen any material updates in years.

jonas21 5 days ago

I think it's less that they sat on their laurels and more that a team of 2 had trouble keeping up with the dozens of well-paid folks working on VSCode. Which suggests that perhaps a shareware model did not work out so well for them.

  • shawabawa3 5 days ago

    They literally stopped developing for about 5 years, it wasn't just about the team not keeping up

    • Ygg2 5 days ago

      Why would you stop developing for 5 years?

      • jon-wood 5 days ago

        Maybe they just wanted to do something else. Sometimes people just don't want to grind on endlessly for theoretically more money when what they've got already is enough for them.

      • WD-42 4 days ago

        Probably to write sublime merge

righthand 5 days ago

Agreed, LSP has replaced Linter extensions and the TabNine LLM which is nice (and snappy). Even if some of the lsp servers are clunky to use.

agos 5 days ago

even before VSCode Atom had started to eat their lunch