Comment by stavros Comment by stavros 3 days ago 4 replies Copy Link View on Hacker News No, this is where this discussion is, since the top comment. Please go elsewhere for straw men.
Copy Link afro88 3 days ago Collapse Comment - No one mentioned anything about "people who can't program at all" until your comment. Up until then the discussion was about using LLMs for production ready code. It's a given that people working on production systems know how to program. Reply View | 3 replies Copy Link stavros 3 days ago Parent Collapse Comment - That is what "auto-edits" (in the first comment) and "vibe coding" (in the second comment) mean. Reply View | 2 replies Copy Link afro88 12 hours ago Root Parent Collapse Comment - The bit you're missing is that people who can program also use "auto edits" and "vibe coding" when it fits the problem at hand Reply View | 1 reply Copy Link stavros 11 hours ago Root Parent Collapse Comment - As someone who can program and used vibe coding, when they use vibe coding and don't look at the output, how do they ensure errors don't compound? Reply View | 0 replies
Copy Link stavros 3 days ago Parent Collapse Comment - That is what "auto-edits" (in the first comment) and "vibe coding" (in the second comment) mean. Reply View | 2 replies Copy Link afro88 12 hours ago Root Parent Collapse Comment - The bit you're missing is that people who can program also use "auto edits" and "vibe coding" when it fits the problem at hand Reply View | 1 reply Copy Link stavros 11 hours ago Root Parent Collapse Comment - As someone who can program and used vibe coding, when they use vibe coding and don't look at the output, how do they ensure errors don't compound? Reply View | 0 replies
Copy Link afro88 12 hours ago Root Parent Collapse Comment - The bit you're missing is that people who can program also use "auto edits" and "vibe coding" when it fits the problem at hand Reply View | 1 reply Copy Link stavros 11 hours ago Root Parent Collapse Comment - As someone who can program and used vibe coding, when they use vibe coding and don't look at the output, how do they ensure errors don't compound? Reply View | 0 replies
Copy Link stavros 11 hours ago Root Parent Collapse Comment - As someone who can program and used vibe coding, when they use vibe coding and don't look at the output, how do they ensure errors don't compound? Reply View | 0 replies
No one mentioned anything about "people who can't program at all" until your comment. Up until then the discussion was about using LLMs for production ready code. It's a given that people working on production systems know how to program.