Comment by vintermann
Comment by vintermann 4 days ago
It could also be a test to look for surprising things that break, in case they want to do this permanently at some later point.
Comment by vintermann 4 days ago
It could also be a test to look for surprising things that break, in case they want to do this permanently at some later point.
You shouldn't use razors haphazardly or you might cut yourself.
A mistake that also weirdly increments some TCP fields for the three subsequent RST packets when that's not how the existing GFW devices behave would need some explanation before you could conclude it to be the most likely explanation.
Hanlon's and Occam's razors point to it being a mistake by the GFW operators, imo.
If it's on purpose, I think you have the most likely motivation.