Comment by anigbrowl
So what? You're just deflecting attention from this story to a poorly researched one written by someone else. That's like me saying people should ignore anything you say because some other lawyer used ChatGPT in court. Do better.
OP explained why this article displayed a bit of economic ignorance, insofar as the framing is confused about what’s the real story. I’m simply providing broader context.
That is, if I start hallucinating citations it’s fair to compare me to AI!