HDThoreaun 3 days ago

Land prices rise with income but housing constraints mean each family needs more land. Just look at the rental market in austin collapsing 20% while incomes continue to rise to empirically falsify your working paper.

greenie_beans 3 days ago

upvoted then realized you are promoting LVT. this is why i think LVT is a terrible idea: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44532444

land value is only a small part of housing costs.

  • sorcerer-mar 3 days ago

    I don't think you understand LVT based on this "not to mention the political debates/decisions over what constitutes "fully utilized"."

    LVT doesn't require any such determination.

    Anyway, I'm not opposed to the solution you mention as well. We should subsidize supply of housing, and supply at any price will serve the same purpose of driving prices down, so yes I agree we should build public housing for higher price points.