Comment by crooked-v
The president of the US personally threatened to illegally take away Rosie O'Donnell's citizenship because he doesn't like her. That seems more 'lawless' to me than some third-world countries.
The president of the US personally threatened to illegally take away Rosie O'Donnell's citizenship because he doesn't like her. That seems more 'lawless' to me than some third-world countries.
You make it sound like some 4D chess ploy to "own the libs". Everything I've seen is that it's just a natural consequence of electing an 80 year old half senile grandpa to arguably the most important role in the world.
How long will this "Nothing to see move on. He's just blustering" excuse is going to be used before people realize that this guy will try that even if it is illegal? With the what has happened to immigration and birthright citizen it doesn't seem far fetched. And it is frankly insulting to tell people that they are wasting time when they express real concern.
thisisit says: "...this guy will try that even if it is illegal..."
How will he "try that"? He hasn't done anything illegal and, if he does, his own staff and the courts will prevent him from doing it.
thisisit says: "With the what has happened to immigration..."
They've slowed illegals entering the country and they've begun to move immigrants out of the country. How is this a problem?
I never cared much for birthright citizenship other than for offspring of slavery but arguing about it hardly seems a good argument for or against Trump.
> He hasn't done anything illegal and, if he does, his own staff and the courts will prevent him from doing it.
Then you must be living under a rock. He is a convicted felon who knowingly broke the law, his people who should fulfil their fiduciary duty helped him.
> I never cared much for birthright citizenship other than for offspring of slavery but arguing about it hardly seems a good argument for or against Trump.
Yep. The goal post shifting Trump supporter. “I can’t refute this so let’s go with “I don’t care for it so not a valid argument””.
Because he sorely needed to troll the public's attention away from l'affair Epstein. Why is this tactic still so non-obvious??