Comment by xyzzy123

Comment by xyzzy123 a day ago

2 replies

This is fair. I think the complaint is that Spring is _beautiful_ in up to medium sized demos, but in any sufficiently large application you always seem to need to dig in and figure out what Spring is doing inside those annotations and do something unspeakable involving the giant stack of factory factory context thread local bean counter manager handler method proxy managers etc.

Also Spring is a kind of franchise or brand, and the individual projects under the umbrella vary a lot in quality.

delecti 21 hours ago

Just about any tool will require a bunch of work at some point in the scale. Some front-load that, and some make it easy to get started but then you hit a point where you need to peek under the covers. Personally I prefer the latter, though I'm sure there's a lot of Stockholm syndrome involved in how I feel about Spring. And Spring's popularity means you're probably not the only one to hit any given problem.

  • sorokod 21 hours ago

    This is a rational attitude but my experience is that engineers do not get to "the latter" at their leasure. What typically happens is that peeking under the covers is forced on them along with a tight timeline.