alganet 16 hours ago

Greed meets greed. Companies hiring cheap labor, being exploited in several fronts.

It was a decision for several companies to spread thin their offshore hiring. They practically invited infiltrators in.

Keep focused. Small companies never mattered for nations, they are irrelevant. Spreading paranoia will not solve their over-reliance on this exploited offshore problem. It will likely lead them to bankrupcy.

Ultimately, it doesn't invalidate what I said. It actually makes my comment more relevant.

  • cyberax 11 hours ago

    > It was a decision for several companies to spread thin their offshore hiring. They practically invited infiltrators in.

    It's not offshore. Infiltrators are pretending that they're in the US. I first saw this 2 years ago, and they were pretty clumsy back then: always blurred background (and refusing to unblur it) and/or doing calls from a windowless office. You could even see their eyes moving, like they're reading the script.

    This year they became much fancier. They use backgrounds with the real time-of-day and weather illumination. The eyes no longer move unnaturally, etc.

    • alganet 9 hours ago

      You miss the point.

      Remote working is in the same vein as offshoring. One enables the other, they're co-dependent. Both are based on greed. In the case of remote working, is avoiding having offices, avoiding paying certain kinds of insurance, etc.

      You are also re-inforcing my original conclusion that what enables these workers is the very same tech that companies are investing on.

      Again, greed meets greed.

      Now it's too late. IT companies will not survive a full return to office, and they won't survive remote working as well.

      The very idea that someone could be using technology to fake an identity was unthinkable. Now that it is not, there's really no place safe.

      If a crisis occours, and the US president goes to Air Force 1, transmits from there, how could you be sure he's not a north korean infiltrator? You can't.

      I think there are still ways out of this, but we're reaching an inflection point that will be hard to overcome.

      ---

      Your commentary seems to provide a valid point of view, and although you disagree, you reinforce my main point.

      • cyberax 9 hours ago

        > Remote working is in the same vein as offshoring.

        No, they're not.

        > You are also re-inforcing my original conclusion that what enables these workers is the very same tech that companies are investing on.

        We should get rid of electricity, then.

        > If a crisis occours, and the US president goes to Air Force 1, transmits from there, how could you be sure he's not a north korean infiltrator? You can't.

        Now you're really reaching.

        • alganet 8 hours ago

          > We should get rid of electricity, then.

          Pathetic.