Comment by jameshart
If it’s not being recorded, what would this AI summary be based on?
If it’s not being recorded, what would this AI summary be based on?
They keep all the video in cloud servers, and everyone sends to be ignoring that. I know from being inside Axon
They are not a body cam company. They sell all sorts of equipment to police, including but not limited to body cams. They used to be named Taser international (guess why!) and later branched out into body cameras. They will happily service any law enforcement client, with or without body cams.
Because people seem to be raising a concern that this AI's summaries of police interactions would be relied upon as a substitute for bodycam footage, with people citing regulations absolving police of obligations to record interactions in the first place.
But this AI is being pushed by Axon, who sells bodycam systems. Do you think they would be touting this as a replacement for bodycams?
The scenario was not Axon would persuade police forces to stop using body cameras. The scenario was police forces would decided to stop using body cameras. And the concerns about this use of generative AI are not about the vendor's identity.
You describe the conviction you want to achieve and the AI makes up a report to secure that.