Except you glossed over the part where the person said they lacked time.
There is programming the art and programming to solve a problem. The art is great - I’ve written software for decades. Life dictates I no longer have as much time, but I still want to solve problems. AI helps me do that in the limited that I have.
This thread is full of examples of people using the tools successfully. I'm also not sure where you're getting the 1-7 days from.
And someone who has the time may learn more by doing things without AI, but that's not what's being discussed. The person you originally responded to and I said we don't have the time.
It's a bit like arguing that AI audiobooks shouldn't exist because they are worse than human read. That may or may not be true, but that's not the discussion. AI may be the only reason an audiobook exist at all for certain books. AI coding is often the same way where someone can build a lot more than they could prior, even if it's imperfect, it may still solve their problem.
The fatal flaw in your theory is that Docker, Claude, and whoever else will add an infinite amount of time spent debugging once you have a sufficiently complex problem, which is usually within 1-7 days of using it.
Please explain to me how I'm wrong. in the event you don't want to hear how I'm right, I am forstalling that while waiting for your reply