Comment by ujkhsjkdhf234
Comment by ujkhsjkdhf234 2 days ago
No judgement but I would love to hear from Google employees who worked on this. Do they believe they are improving the internet in any way?
Comment by ujkhsjkdhf234 2 days ago
No judgement but I would love to hear from Google employees who worked on this. Do they believe they are improving the internet in any way?
I don't think ads are immoral but I think the way FAANG does ads and tracking is immoral. Google does not do enough to vet ads for malicious activity such as scams and viruses. The FBI in recent years has started recommending an adblocker for that reason.
They are being paid to think what they're told to think.
There is also an argument to be made that adblocking is immoral. I think the idea is pervasive enough to fill a team of willing people, especially if you pay them 100k/year to at least go along with it for the time being
I haven't made up my own mind about it yet, just that this might be a factor in why one would move the facilitating technology backwards in this way (and forwards in other ways, apparently: some people in the thread are reporting that uBlock Lite is faster. Not that I can tell the difference between a clean Firefox without add-ons (I regularly use that for work reasons) and a Firefox with uBlock Origin (my daily driver) except if the page is bogged down from all the ads)