gpm 5 days ago

I did this locally to try it out :) Also stubbed out the telemetry and added jj support. "Personalizing" software like this is definitely one of LLMs superpowers.

I'm not particularly inclined to publish it because I don't want to associate myself with a project harvesting emails like this.

  • BeetleB 5 days ago

    > and added jj support

    Please do the same for Aider :-)

    https://github.com/Aider-AI/aider/issues/4250

    • gpm 5 days ago

      Be the change you want to see! This is pretty close to a best case task for these models because it's a relatively direct "translation" of existing code.

      There's a big difference between "something actually ready for use" and "claude hacked sometime together with bubblegum and ducttape that works on my system" though - doing it properly will probably take a bit of work.

  • janoelze 5 days ago

    yes, i was just doing/thinking the same, it was an interesting experience to sculpt a somewhat complex codebase to my needs in minutes.

hsbauauvhabzb 5 days ago

Use a telemetry backed tool to remove telemetry from another telemetry backed tool?

  • TeMPOraL 5 days ago

    There's telemetry you consent to, and telemetry you don't. Just because I'm fine with a tool like Claude Code collecting some telemetry, doesn't mean I'm fine with a different party collecting telemetry - and the two products being used together doesn't change it. It's not naive, it's simply my right.

  • janoelze 5 days ago

    it came to mind first, you're free to use whatever flavour of LLM f̶l̶o̶a̶t̶s̶ ̶y̶o̶u̶r̶ ̶b̶o̶a̶t̶ vibes your code.

    • hsbauauvhabzb 5 days ago

      That doesn’t change the naïvety of the response.

      • collingreen 3 days ago

        Your insult calling the commenter naive requires all telemetry from all sources to be the same.

        I disagree with who is naive in this exchange.