Comment by bibek_poudel

Comment by bibek_poudel 12 days ago

8 replies

I read through one of his emails. This guy is great at communicating his interest and signaling himself as a "high performer".

Perhaps, he is also genuinely good at cracking these interviews. No wonder, he's been through so many of them.

alpb 11 days ago
  • mpeg 10 days ago

    That's a particularly terrible cold email, you can tell he didn't even bother applying some basic personalisation to it outside of [COMPANY_NAME]

    • sreekanth850 10 days ago

      Nutshell: Toxic founders who want developers to code 24X7 may hired him seeing this.

      • anon_2222 10 days ago

        ding ding ding. both soham + recruiter implied he basically just codes day and night. our founder (yc) was drooling! there's a very specific type of company + founder that falls for this stuff. no surprise he targeted ai startups.

        • sreekanth850 10 days ago

          Yes, this is probably what happened. Not like he was a super human engineer.

mathiaspoint 12 days ago

Interviewing really is a distinct skill from contributing and the more people crank it the more it seems to test for interview ability.

  • ninetyninenine 8 days ago

    IQ tests are also distinct skills but IQ scores are the most quantifiable and studied numbers in all of psychology and correlate with all kinds of things like job performance.

    I think the purpose of the interview is the same thing. Even though there's no strong evidence for a correlation it's reasonable to believe intuitively that there is.

  • skeeter2020 10 days ago

    I suspect (and have seen some evidence) that the interviews he aced were algo-based. Doing well in these is very repeatable, with low additional effort. Behavioural are much harder to do at scale.