Comment by timr

Comment by timr 2 days ago

5 replies

> The ununiformed, masked men that refuse to identify themselves and won't show any legal documents have unilateral authority and cannot be questioned. Do not resist.

Again, Brad Lander was not being detained. He had nothing to do with anything. That's not "resistance", it's just interference.

Tadpole9181 2 days ago

Brad Lander saw unidentified, masked, ununiformed men who refused to speak, had no legal documentation, and would not identify themselves to anyone carrying a man against his will.

I hope it's not against the rules to swear, but this cannot be stated clearly enough: That's called a fucking kidnapping.

Did you not hear that someone pretending to be LEO attempted (and succeed in one case) the political assassination of two legislators and their spouses this weekend? More than ever, every single LEO should be under scrutiny for identification! He has every right to prevent a man from being disappeared by God knows who!

You may be a boot-stepping authoritarian who fully condones a US gestapo who can disappear anyone without question. The rest of us have higher standards and common sense.

  • timr 2 days ago

    > Brad Lantern saw unidentified, masked, ununiformed men who refused to speak, had no legal documentation, and would not identify themselves to anyone carrying a man against his will.

    Brad Lander was at the man's trial for illegal immigration, which was in a federal court building. So, you know...context matters. Also you can clearly see uniforms in the video [1], but I digress.

    There is exactly zero chance that Lander was under the illusion that this hypothetical, rogue, pirate kidnapping operation smuggled themselves into a federal immigration court, Boondock Saints-style, in order to abduct the one guy Lander happened to be watching in the immigration trial just moments before.

    [1] https://www.amny.com/news/brad-lander-arrested-ice-court-hea...

  • RandomBacon 2 days ago

    > I hope it's not against the rules to swear

    Perhaps then, you should go ahead and read the rules?

    https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

    • Tadpole9181 a day ago

      Sorry, I was being rhetorical for emphasis. And as a slight acknowledgement of HN's more recent flag-happy state.

      • RandomBacon 15 hours ago

        No problem. I also acknowledge that some people find the expectation that they should read rules offensive and worthy of downvotes as my previous comment was downvoted by someone else (and I'm okay with this comment also being downvoted because talking ("complaining") about such is against the rules lol).