Comment by tptacek

I know you two are off on your own thing right now, which is cool, but I just want to say that the point of my comment is solely that the kind of code review involved in LLM output is different and easier than human code review (because of the lack of obligation to salvage the code if it's suspect), and we all seem to have reached a consensus on that point.

I explicitly wasn't trying to persuade anyone that the cost/benefit tradeoff for LLM coding was positive. I obviously believe it is, but reasonable people can disagree.