Comment by 28304283409234
Comment by 28304283409234 2 days ago
I do not understand why this is flagged.
Comment by 28304283409234 2 days ago
I do not understand why this is flagged.
>Because it's HN not /r/politics
Poltical stories that show "evidence of some interesting new phenomenon" are not against the guidelines. A few years back someone said nearly half the YC batch was non-US. I think stories about city comptrollers and mayoral candidates getting arrested at immigration court would have some bearing on whether someone would want to base a company in the US.
A user who has enough karma to flag stories has flagged it for whatever reason, maybe they think the story is flamebait or without merit, who knows. It is not possible for a user with equal or higher karma to unflag it I believe. Only a moderator can unflag it, and if you want them to do that you have to email them (address in guidelines, no guarentee of success).
> Poltical stories that show "evidence of some interesting new phenomenon" are not against the guidelines.
Call me evil and obtuse, but this is neither interesting, nor new. The only thing new here is that (it seems) a huge swath of people are learning how the law works for the first time.
Brad Lander had nothing to do with the situation. He's a politician, and he was there "observing". It's the equivalent if I walked down to the Manhattan courthouse, ran up to the first defendant in shackles I saw in the hallway, and started interfering with their movement. I'd be arrested.
The fact that you, as a random bystander, aren't shown ID and briefed on the situation isn't relevant. If you aren't involved, you aren't involved.
The ununiformed, masked men that refuse to identify themselves and won't show any legal documents have unilateral authority and cannot be questioned. Do not resist.
You will not receive a trial. You will be sent to a black site. Your family or lawyer will not be informed.
America: home of the free.
> A lot of us doesn't come here to read about US internal politics
I see this a lot, and I think, "then why are you posting comments in a thread for a article discussing US internal politics?"
Because they have an opinion on it, but want to appear even-handed.
US internal politics are also US external politics and all of this shit has been cheerled by the biggest names in Silicon Valley.
Hey remember when Peter Theil said we should get rid of democracy and Paul Graham said "we aren't going to like, stop giving money to people because of their opinions"? Pepperidge Farm remembers.
Remember when the A in A16Z ran the futurist manifesto through a thesaurus?
Remember when Musk spent a quarter billion dollars to ensure this exact outcome?
There's tons of stuff on HN that I don't come here to read
You can always downvote or skip the article. Flagging it makes the decision for everyone else.
Since you're so concerned about the rules, do you mind outlining the ones regarding comment quality, topicality, and personal attacks?
The destruction of a democracy is not left, nor is it right.
Because it's HN not /r/politics
A lot of us doesn't come here to read about US internal politics