Comment by JimDabell

Comment by JimDabell 6 months ago

11 replies

That’s exactly what’s rude about it. Don’t make sure you have their attention. Just send the actual message.

If it’s urgent enough that the actual message isn’t enough, “Hello” isn’t going to cut it either.

macspoofing 6 months ago

I didn't make a value judgment on the practice, but it is a reason why you may get a "hello" message.

  • cogman10 6 months ago

    Funnily, I've mostly gotten it at 3am. I've literally had 24h time lapse from the initial hello to actual question.

    I've also had cases where I've immediately responded "hi" only to get the question about 1h later.

CGMthrowaway 6 months ago

That's only rude sometimes. We don't typically talk to other people in real life without confirming their attention (e.g. via eye contact) first.

  • OkayPhysicist 6 months ago

    That's because we're communicating synchronously in person. If you say something when I'm not listening to you, I will probably start listening midway through your statement, and miss potentially vital info. In a slack message, I can just read it again.

    • CGMthrowaway 6 months ago

      IDK about you but I get chats from 30+ different people and I usually miss at least one person's message a day as it falls off the "front page" so to speak

      • int_19h 6 months ago

        I don't see how "hello?" helps with that. If anything, it makes things worse if everybody does that, because now half of those chats from 30+ different people are that, drowning out the useful messages.

  • JimDabell 6 months ago

    None of this discussion is about in-person conversations.

macspoofing 6 months ago

>That’s exactly what’s rude about it.

By the way, I also hate the "hello"-only message. I am, however, guilty of writing "Hey. Do you have a second to chat" - typically in cases where either through chat or video conference I want to go through something that is more involved, and I also want some confirmation of understanding and acknowledgement.