nottorp 11 hours ago

Show me another browser that still runs uBlock Origin.

Other browsers may be less resource intensive but with unreadable internet.

  • ziml77 9 hours ago

    I was using a Chromium-based browser for a bit until I looked into how forks are handling the Mv3 changeover. Seems none them are willing to maintain Mv2 support. A couple of them claim it's fine because they have ad blocking built into the browser, but I know from experience none of them work as well as uBO. So, I switched back to Firefox where I'm plenty happy.

  • diggan 3 hours ago

    Personally, Tree-style tabs (via Sideberry nowadays) is why I can't let go of Firefox. Seems some browsers have started adding vertical tabs, which is cool, but missing the holy tree structure still.

    A browser that blocks ads, has tree-style tabs and is FOSS would be enough for me to switch, doesn't even have to have addons/extensions if those things are built-in.

  • DigitallyFidget 3 hours ago

    Vivaldi is what I use. uBlock works fine with it. I have no issues with content loading or anything weird. I just describe it as "chrome, but if someone actually cared about the UI and functionality", and the mouse gestures are super nice.

    I went to it from Firefox ages ago and haven't looked back or missed Firefox and all its issues even once.

    I can't say your experience with it will be as good as mine or not, but it is a browser with adblock, which is also built in, but I prefer the plugin version.

  • msgodel 7 hours ago

    Brave not only allows manifest v2 extensions but includes a comparable ad blocker OOTB.

    • illiac786 6 hours ago

      Yeah but for how long? There will come a time where maintaining Mv2 compatibility will become too onerous for them – and google will try to make that moment happen sooner than later.

  • devmor 9 hours ago

    Not just unreadable - actively malicious. Every now and then I run into a website with a bunch of custom javascript that doesn't function in Firefox, and I'll have to open up Edge or Chromium (depending on what computer I'm using). Every time this happens, I'm immediately accosted with "features" or advertisements attempting to hijack my experience to sell me something or steal from me.

    As long as Firefox supports the tools that protect me from the hostile behavior of websites, it will remain my browser of choice.

  • lcnmrn 7 hours ago

    Setup AdGuard DNS on your end. Works perfect on any OS.

    • nottorp 7 hours ago

      Do DNS based solutions provide a "normal" browsing experience or you get fancy error blocks wherever the ads were supposed to go?

      uBlock Origin can modify the page.

  • anonbanker 9 hours ago

    Brave re-implemented everything uBlock Origin does, and did it in Rust.

    • kjkjadksj 8 hours ago

      But its Brave, crypto aligned projects are a nonstarter.

      • msgodel 7 hours ago

        You have to go out of your way to use any of the crypto features. None of them are forced on you any more than the built in TOR/IPFS/BitTorrent clients. It's just there if you want it.

      • guywithahat 7 hours ago

        Don't use the crypto portion??

        I don't know what else to tell you, you're not even paying for the browser, it's a free service. Any browser that implements an ad blocker is probably also going to have a lot of features you don't use

        • jjani 6 hours ago

          Just to vouch for this, I've been using Brave for many years. Haven't done a single crypto transaction in my life. Whatever crypto features it may have don't get in the way at all.

      • anonbanker 4 hours ago

        "crypto-aligned" is such a gigantic red herring.

        so use the --disable-features flag at runtime?

        maybe go into brave://flags and disable the wallet?

        or just admit you're only against Brave because Brendan Eich privately donated $2,000 to a failed CA Proposition?

ofrzeta 13 hours ago

Still currently Firefox is the best option we have, don't we? In terms of compatability and features anyway. For years working as a full-stack developer I stubbornly sticked to Firefox and it has served me well.

  • dlcarrier 5 hours ago

    Yeah, outside of Chromium forks the only other option is Gecko-based browsers. I use Seamonkey and Palemoon, to avoid the Mozilla Foundation's shenanigans. The performance isn't great, and I have to occasionally restart anything running on the Gecko engine, althogh the latter is also true for Chromium forks.

  • squircle 13 hours ago

    I work across the stack but necessarily use the browsers end users are working with. Also, I can't pay my fecking credit card on Linux or any browser other than Edge. Whatever tho. A hammer is a hammer.

    • dv_dt 9 hours ago

      Not being able to use Firefox for banking or finance is something that hasn't happened to me in years. When it did happen, it was usually fixed with a simple workaround of sending a custom user agent string.

      • guenthert 8 hours ago

        I think e.g. Capital One is using Wasm, yuck. That needs to be enabled (it is by default in Firefox).

    • CrankyBear 10 hours ago

      Ah... I use Chrome on Linux, and it works just fine for banks and credit cards.

      • fortyseven 10 hours ago

        Same. It's exceptionally rare for Firefox to fail me and force me to use a different browser. I'm when it does happen, it's either a Chrome specific feature, or a failure of the developer.

mrkramer 8 hours ago

I guess complaints are aimed at Firefox's desktop browser but mobile Firefox browser is pretty good and they are the only mobile browser that I know of that supports third party extensions. That fact by itself should be a killer app for Firefox mobile browser.

  • Jotalea 3 hours ago

    I've been using Firefox mobile browser on my not that old Samsung Galaxy S21FE for one year or more, and I can confidently say that the performance is awful. I often see delayed app loading (the navigation layer loads while the actual webview is still transparent) [1], it has a high memory usage and often caused the system to terminate another app that runs in the background at the moment. Rendering issues are also a thing. It often glitches and flashes white when opening/closing the on-screen keyboard and it blinds me for a second if using at night.

    But I keep using it because I use the sync feature and it sucks less than chrome.

    [1] https://files.catbox.moe/aqhh3e.mp4

  • illiac786 6 hours ago

    On iOS everyone is still stuck on WebKit.

    Also EU seems to be bringing light at the end of the tunnel on this one. Like with alternate stores, alternate NFC payment, alternate standard apps, etc. EU is seriously amazing on this, in my view.

    • msgodel 5 hours ago

      Normally I don't like governments stepping in for this sort of thing but good fucking God Apple has been such a poor steward of their platform that it's actually creating problems even for people who don't use it. This is one of those situations where it really is necessary.

  • vunderba 6 hours ago

    Orion (which I believe is made by the same people that developed the Kagi search engine) supports both Firefox and Chrome extensions though it's still at the experimental stage. More importantly, I believe firefox on iOS is still backed by WebKit and thus does not support regular extensions either.

  • wand3r 7 hours ago

    Yeah, understandable. The problem for me is the desktop app sucks. I need both for browsing sync, passwords and adblock and 3rd party search. Brave works best for me on Mac and iPhone. Most of the extensions I would use are built in, but I dont think it fully supports 3rd party extensions. I am not sure, is that possible on iPhone?

ahartmetz 7 hours ago

Firefox is fine, what are they on about? I'm not going to switch to Chrome because Firefox is a few percent away from perfect. Firefox desktop recently added tab groups and it's a fantastic feature.

  • m463 7 hours ago

    It phones home, a lot, from the moment you install it. It has plenty of connections to google too.

    The good thing is that the source code is mostly* out there and you or someone else can figure out what it's doing.

    [*] don't know about drm stuff

    • ahartmetz 5 hours ago

      What does it phone home about?

      • baobun 4 hours ago

        Everyone asking this should MitM their own browser and take a look into the requests.

        Eye-opening and pretty straightforward with e.g. mitmproxy. Strip TLS with a temporarily trusted self-signed cert to get the whole picture.

bigbadfeline 8 hours ago

Firefox has its problems but it's the least bad of all, and I've tried them all. Chromium-based browsers are a non-starter, Brave messed up that one big time. On the other hand, Firefox-derived browsers are used by VPNs that know how to do web privacy and security - this is the way, get Firefox, configure it properly, make a few minor changes and give your users a better option.

em-bee 3 hours ago

mozilla has tried many projects over the years. i don't remember any that survived. so i'll wait an see whether they manage to ruin firefox with AI before i switch. until then firefox is still better than chromium/chrome.

and even then unfortunately if we don't have a choice. if firefox dies the result will be a chromium based monoculture. that's not healthy. firefox may be the worst browser except for all the others.

let's see if ladybird gets any traction and manages to keep its funding continuously. but they are still a year or two away from being able to even compete with firefox and chrome.

DamnInteresting 7 hours ago

I completely disagree. For me, Firefox is the best current browser on the whole, and in recent years I've moved most of my work and play away from Chrome, Arc, Safari, etc. in favor of Firefox. It has retained support for Manifest v2, which is huge for me. The Chrome maintainers seem hellbent on cultivating the web into an ad-addled hellscape.

  • butshouldyou 5 hours ago

    Firefox would have to be seriously broken for me to consider moving away. Chromium's lack of ad blocker support is a deal breaker.

[removed] 8 hours ago
[deleted]
yamapikarya 9 hours ago

i like brave. it just works

  • anonbanker 4 hours ago

    It's really depressing that you've been downvoted to grey. People don't even have coherent reasons to dislike the browser.

    • em-bee 3 hours ago

      i don't use brave because it is based on chromium. i upvoted the comment anyways.