Comment by dr_dshiv
It’s mostly attitude that you are learning. Playfulness, persistence and a willingness to start from scratch again and again.
It’s mostly attitude that you are learning. Playfulness, persistence and a willingness to start from scratch again and again.
Gambling is where I end up if I’m tired and try to get an LLM to build my hobby project for me from scratch in one go, not really bothering to read the code properly. It’s stupid and a waste of time. Sometimes it’s easier to get started this way though.
But more seriously, in the ideal case refining a prompt based on a misunderstanding of an LLM due to ambiguity in your task description is actually doing the meaningful part of the work in software development. It is exactly about defining the edge cases, and converting into language what is it that you need for a task. Iterating on that is not gambling.
But of course if you are not doing that, but just trying to get a ”smarter” LLM with (hopefully deprecated study of) ”prompt engineering” tricks, then that is about building yourself a skill that can become useless tomorrow.
Why is thinking important? Think about it a bit.
is it more important for a chess engine to be able to think? Or is it able to win by brute force through searching a sufficient outcome?
If the outcome is indistinguisable from using "thinking" as the process rather than brute force, why would the process matter regarding how the outcome was achieved?
>persistence and a willingness to start from scratch again and again.
i.e. continually gambling and praying the model spits something out that works instead of thinking.