Comment by eigenspace

Comment by eigenspace a day ago

2 replies

Julia isn't a lisp, but I think it's the most lispy non-S-expression based language around these days. The language creators took the lessons from lisp very seriously, and it shares a lot of functionality and philosophy with lisps.

hatmatrix a day ago

Well I think the original author was a fan of Lisp and implemented the first Julia parser in femtolisp, IIRC. (And femtolisp was a lightweight Lisp of his own.)

  • Joel_Mckay 18 hours ago

    Julia is somewhat different:

    1. readability with explicit broadcast operators

    2. interoperability with other languages including R and Python

    3. performance often exceeding numpy and C/C++ code

    4. usability in numerous workflows:

    https://www.queryverse.org/

    The idea of using Lisp or Prolog in a production environment doesn't sound fun at all. Yet, they do make some types of problems easier to handle. =3