Comment by Aurornis
> Hey CO2 is still greenhouse
SF6 has 25,000 times the 100-year global warming potential as CO2.
You’d have to accidentally vent thousands of these breakers to equal the same global warming potential as one SF6 breaker
When it comes to topics like this, reducing it to a binary is-or-isn’t greenhouse gas is the wrong way to look at it.
I was responding to the badly editorialised title which read "without greehouse gases". I think I am on pretty solid ground here, the title misled.
Now the title reads "Reinventing". Is this a pejorative? Engineers make firsts too. TFA's title works just fine.