Comment by nothisagain
Comment by nothisagain a day ago
They also infringed on the original lisp-stat https://homepage.stat.uiowa.edu/~luke/xls/xlsinfo/ without so much as an acknowledgement a previous time this was spammed.
Comment by nothisagain a day ago
They also infringed on the original lisp-stat https://homepage.stat.uiowa.edu/~luke/xls/xlsinfo/ without so much as an acknowledgement a previous time this was spammed.
To be fair, Lisp has a tradition of concurrent unrelated variants.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sV7C6Ezl35A
Yet, a failure to cite related parent projects certainly needs addressed. Maybe forgivable if it was a first year student. =3
It appears to be derived from that:
https://github.com/Lisp-Stat/lisp-stat/blob/2514dc3004b09942...
And
https://lisp-stat.dev/blog/2021/05/09/statistical-analysis-w...