Comment by convolvatron

Comment by convolvatron a day ago

2 replies

so much of programming has been shaped by fads than I don't think you can safely point the finger at 'everything is a dsl' as being a root cause. back when lisp was really being put out to pasture, it seemed like the major complaints were about performance and syntax. and how if it wasn't object oriented then it really belonged in the dustbin (of course ignoring clos and the mop)

tartoran 17 hours ago

I'm sure of that but it seems that LISPs being too flexible hurt their adoption rate somewhat and the mainstream preferred to have more guardrails on their programming languages. Ultimately developers are the ones who decide what they like and popularity quite often reflects what's being done commercially. I agree about the fads part.

  • b0a04gl 10 hours ago

    flexibility didn't reduce adoption : lack of expectation did. once a language stops assuming the user will change it, the culture settles into consumption. lisp didn't ask permission to be rewritten, most modern stacks do