Comment by echelon

Comment by echelon a day ago

4 replies

This is a silly question.

It will never be enough until we can manipulate the fabric of space and time directly as gods and create entirely new universes and physics and live forever for an infinity infinities.

The ratio of our infinitesimal, geologically small existence to the whole of the light cone and the observable universe - it is just a glimpse at the fractal of what will be enough to satiate our curiosity and desire.

whoisyc a day ago

This.

The same drive for betterment that made our species “kill such beautiful minimalism” was the one that lifted billions out of subsistence farming and 50% infant death rate, and will be the one to escape the destruction of planet earth by sun’s evolution. You cannot have one without the other.

  • smolder 18 hours ago

    There is societal improvement and then there is the huge amount of ego driven waste and externalized harm. Ideally, theoretically, we could have a lot of the former without a lot of the latter. In practice this ratio seems to be getting worse. Me-first attitudes are way up, profit is misunderstood as merit.

bitlax a day ago

I don't think OP is asking whether we should give up looking for advances in astrophysics. OP is asking "why did we add all of these freaking popups and theme tweaks? They're distracting me from using my computer to make advances in astrophysics!"

I'd say try Linux.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/8T5pyGiTPdE

psychoslave a day ago

Moving in that direction, even recursive infinities won't bring someone anywhere near satisfaction, contentment and delight.

Curiosity and desire can be focused on minimalism and elegance of the smallest most essential cores of whatever is at stake.