Comment by withinboredom
Comment by withinboredom 2 days ago
Ummm. Maybe you should look up Helen Keller.
Comment by withinboredom 2 days ago
Ummm. Maybe you should look up Helen Keller.
If you put the LLM in a never ending loop, it would definitely be doing something.
My analogy of being in loop means being in a live state. So we as humans are in the loop continuously, we do have a way to exit the loop, but in that comparison it means taking our own life. We are in loops of getting input and producing output. You can also give LLM a tool to shut itself down, or you can give it tools to build on its knowledge base, so it would always be outputting new tokens that are based on new input and are producing different output.
E.g. it could have access to camera and microphone feed, which is automatically given to it in interval as part of the loop, it could call tools or functions to store specific bits and pieces of information, to store in its RAG or whatever based knowledge base. It is not going to be in the loop of producing the same token over and over, it would be new tokens because the context and environment is constantly evolving.
Helen Keller did in fact make her demands they just couldn’t be known. In contrast the LLM does nothing of its own volition.