Comment by userbinator
Comment by userbinator 2 days ago
That was a problem a year or two ago. New AI models have gotten past that point now.
Comment by userbinator 2 days ago
That was a problem a year or two ago. New AI models have gotten past that point now.
Is that a joke? Because 4o image generation (assuming you click "Image Generate" which uses gpt-image-1) EASILY handles rendering hands with the proper number of fingers even without specifying something like that.
If anything, it's actually MORE difficult to generate hands with an improper number of fingers. Apologies to Count Rugen.
The tweet about gpt 4o image generation capabilities release had 4 fingers.
I'd like to see that tweet if you have it. I also don't remember the intro page they put out having any such issue:
If you consider finger count to be the lowest bar, then it's still a problem. People just aren't generally creative enough to find the cracks.
Think in terms of hands, their components, and their function, and test again. Be specific.
So? My point wasn't that they were capable of EVERYTHING - it was addressing what looked like to me (and likely to any casual observer) factually incorrect information.
You're also really talking to the wrong person about potential deficiencies in GenAI for images.
I run an entire site where I compare a multitude of prompts I CREATED to explicitly test state of the art major generative image providers (Imagen4, gpt-image-1, Flux Kontext, etc.) - I'm all too aware of their shortcomings.
openai native 4o image generation generates 4 fingers instead.