Comment by empiricus

Comment by empiricus 2 days ago

2 replies

At a minimum we should start from something captured close the reality, and then get creative from that point.. SDR is like black-and-white movies (not quite, but close). We can get creative with it, but can we just see the original natural look? HDR (and the wider color space associated) has a fighting chance to look real, but looking real seems far away from what movie makers are doing.

jiggawatts 2 days ago

I have a Nikon Z8, which can capture 60 fps 8K footage with (roughly speaking) the equivalent of 1000-nit HDR. The video data rate is something absurd, measured in many gigabits.

If you look at the raw footage on an OLED HDR monitor, it's like looking out of a window! You get a feeling that you could just reach out and touch the objects behind the panel.

I've seen a few modern HDR productions that have the same "realism aesthetic" and I rather liked it. I've also enjoyed HDR used as a "special effect" with gleaming highlights everywhere.

Both styles have their place.

  • nottorp a day ago

    But the "special effect" should come with a warning label.

    Tbh so should the excessive messing with colours that's in fashion these days.