Comment by catigula Comment by catigula 2 days ago 4 replies Copy Link View on Hacker News Completely different argument.
Copy Link kjkjadksj 2 days ago Collapse Comment - It was an example of research on women’s health being underfunded or underresearched. Reply View | 3 replies Copy Link catigula 2 days ago Parent Collapse Comment - No, it was a non-sequitur argument after having your core premise disproven with an extremely common and well-known example of women's health being extremely well-funded. You even carved out special pleading by trying to exempt it. Reply View | 2 replies Copy Link vpribish 2 days ago Root Parent Collapse Comment - maybe you could presume sincerity and not respond like a prick? Reply View | 1 reply Copy Link catigula 2 days ago Root Parent Collapse Comment - [flagged] Reply View | 0 replies
Copy Link catigula 2 days ago Parent Collapse Comment - No, it was a non-sequitur argument after having your core premise disproven with an extremely common and well-known example of women's health being extremely well-funded. You even carved out special pleading by trying to exempt it. Reply View | 2 replies Copy Link vpribish 2 days ago Root Parent Collapse Comment - maybe you could presume sincerity and not respond like a prick? Reply View | 1 reply Copy Link catigula 2 days ago Root Parent Collapse Comment - [flagged] Reply View | 0 replies
Copy Link vpribish 2 days ago Root Parent Collapse Comment - maybe you could presume sincerity and not respond like a prick? Reply View | 1 reply Copy Link catigula 2 days ago Root Parent Collapse Comment - [flagged] Reply View | 0 replies
It was an example of research on women’s health being underfunded or underresearched.